public-html@w3.org from January 2008 by author

Adam Roben

Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 25 January)

Al Gilman

dual [sic] approach to ARIA embedding [was: Re: upcoming ARIA publicatoins, test coordination (ISSUE-14)] (Wednesday, 23 January)

Alexander Mueller

Re: New Input type proposal (Wednesday, 23 January)
Re: New Input type proposal (Wednesday, 23 January)
Re: Issues with <input type="hash"> (was Re: New Input type proposal) (Wednesday, 16 January)
Re: New Input type proposal (Wednesday, 16 January)
Re: New Input type proposal (Monday, 14 January)
Re: New Input type proposal (Monday, 14 January)
Re: New Input type proposal (Friday, 11 January)
Re: New Input type proposal (Friday, 11 January)
Re: New Input type proposal (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: New Input type proposal (Thursday, 10 January)
New Input type proposal (Wednesday, 9 January)

Andrew Fedoniouk

Re: Underline element. (Friday, 4 January)

Anne van Kesteren

Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Wednesday, 30 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Monday, 28 January)
Re: HTML5 draft: id attribute question (Saturday, 26 January)
Re: ISSUE-29 (scope-uri-schemes): Should the HTML 5 specification introduce URI schemes such as javascript:? [HTML Principles/Requirements] (Saturday, 26 January)
Re: lang and RFC3066 (Saturday, 26 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 25 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 25 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 25 January)
Re: iframe@security (Monday, 21 January)
Re: iframe@security (Monday, 21 January)
DOCTYPE sniffing incomplete (Thursday, 3 January)
<script> execution and load event dispatching (Wednesday, 2 January)

Arne Johannessen

Re: Versioning and html[5] (Wednesday, 23 January)

Ben 'Cerbera' Millard

Re: Header cell in top left of data tables (Monday, 28 January)
Re: Header cell in top left of data tables (Sunday, 27 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (<image>) (Saturday, 26 January)
Re: Versioning and html[5] (Thursday, 24 January)
Re: Versioning and html[5] (Wednesday, 23 January)
Re: Examples of colgroup/rowgroup attributes (Tuesday, 22 January)
Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG (Saturday, 12 January)
Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG (Friday, 11 January)

Ben Boyle

Re: Header cell in top left of data tables (Tuesday, 29 January)
Re: Header cell in top left of data tables (Monday, 28 January)
Header cell in top left of data tables (Sunday, 27 January)
Re: Regarding the <abbr> tag (Saturday, 26 January)
Re: prose content and del elements (typo?) (Monday, 21 January)
3.8.3. The nav element (Saturday, 19 January)
prose content and del elements (typo?) (Saturday, 19 January)
iframe@security (Saturday, 19 January)
Re: Suffestions for improvement (Monday, 14 January)
Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5 (Friday, 11 January)
Re: Underline element. (Sunday, 6 January)
Re: Underline element. (Saturday, 5 January)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

Re: HTML WG Action-46: javascript scheme (Friday, 25 January)

Boris Zbarsky

Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Tuesday, 29 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Tuesday, 29 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Tuesday, 29 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Tuesday, 29 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Sunday, 27 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Sunday, 27 January)
Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] (Saturday, 26 January)
Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] (Saturday, 26 January)
Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] (Friday, 25 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 25 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 25 January)
Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] (Friday, 25 January)
Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] (Friday, 25 January)
Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] (Friday, 25 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 25 January)
Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] (Friday, 25 January)
Re: [whatwg] WF2 - <form action=""> (Friday, 18 January)
Re: [whatwg] WF2 - <form action=""> (Friday, 18 January)
Re: [whatwg] WF2 - <form action=""> (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: [whatwg] WF2 - <form action=""> (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: input type="file" problems (Monday, 14 January)

Ca Phun Ung

Re: Underline element. (Monday, 7 January)
Re: Underline element. (Monday, 7 January)
Re: Underline element. (Thursday, 3 January)

Charles McCathieNevile

Re: Underline element issue. (Thursday, 24 January)
names Re: Underline element. (Wednesday, 16 January)
names Re: Underline element. (Wednesday, 16 January)
Re: Please change the current name of the specification to "HTML5 and XHTML5" (Wednesday, 16 January)
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft? ISSUE-19 (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Underline element. (Monday, 7 January)
Decision making Re: RDFa Re: Underline element. (Monday, 7 January)

Chasen Le Hara

Re: New Input type proposal (Wednesday, 16 January)

Chris Wilson

RE: Versioning and html[5] (Thursday, 24 January)
RE: Versioning and html[5] (Tuesday, 22 January)
RE: [whatwg] Video codec requirements changed (Thursday, 17 January)
RE: [whatwg] Video codec requirements changed (Thursday, 17 January)
RE: [whatwg] Video codec requirements changed (Saturday, 12 January)

Dan Connolly

Re: ISSUE-29 (scope-uri-schemes): Should the HTML 5 specification introduce URI schemes such as javascript:? [HTML Principles/Requirements] (Wednesday, 30 January)
Re: Versioning and html[5] (ISSUE-4) (Wednesday, 23 January)
handling comments on behalf of the HTML WG (Wednesday, 23 January)
Re: upcoming ARIA publicatoins, test coordination (ISSUE-14) (Wednesday, 23 January)
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft? ISSUE-19 (Friday, 18 January)
no HTML WG teleconference this week (maybe IRC office hours) (Wednesday, 16 January)
Re: Reminder for organizations to vote (Saturday, 12 January)
Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG (and story telling) (Friday, 11 January)
Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft? ISSUE-19 (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG (Wednesday, 9 January)
SURVEY: Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft? ISSUE-19 (Wednesday, 9 January)

Daniel Glazman

Re: HTML 5 WD (not technical) (Thursday, 24 January)
HTML 5 WD (not technical) (Wednesday, 23 January)

Daniel Schattenkirchner

Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5 (Friday, 11 January)

Dave Singer

Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 25 January)
Re: IMG tag (Wednesday, 16 January)
Re: [whatwg] Video codec requirements changed (Monday, 7 January)
Re: [whatwg] Video codec requirements changed (Monday, 7 January)

David Dailey

Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Tuesday, 29 January)

David Gerard

Re: [whatwg] Video codec requirements changed (Monday, 7 January)

David Håsäther

Re: <?doctype ?> instead of <!doctype > (Tuesday, 8 January)

David Naylor

HTML5 draft: id attribute question (Saturday, 26 January)

David Orchard

RE: Suffestions for improvement (Monday, 14 January)

Dean Edridge

Please change the current name of the specification to "HTML5 and XHTML5" (Tuesday, 15 January)
Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG (Saturday, 12 January)
Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5 (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5 (Thursday, 10 January)

DESCHAMPS Stephane ROSI/SI CLIENT

RE: Underline element. (Monday, 7 January)

Dmitry Turin

Re[2]: <?doctype ?> instead of <!doctype > (Wednesday, 9 January)
Re[2]: <?doctype ?> instead of <!doctype > (Wednesday, 9 January)
<?doctype ?> instead of <!doctype > (Tuesday, 8 January)

Doug Jones

lang and RFC3066 (Saturday, 26 January)

Doug Schepers

Re: Changes to the Status of this Document section to address recent feedback (Sunday, 13 January)

Dr. Olaf Hoffmann

Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Tuesday, 29 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Tuesday, 29 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Saturday, 26 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 25 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (<image>) (Friday, 25 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 25 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 25 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 25 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 25 January)
img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 25 January)
Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints) (Friday, 4 January)

Federico Bianco Prevot

Re: [whatwg] Video codec requirements changed (Monday, 7 January)

Garrett Smith

Re: IMG tag (Wednesday, 16 January)

Geoff Richards

Re: [whatwg] WF2 - <form action=""> (Thursday, 17 January)

Geoffrey Sneddon

Re: New Input type proposal (Monday, 14 January)
Re: [whatwg] Video codec requirements changed (Saturday, 12 January)

Gregory J. Rosmaita

ACTION-23 modified/pending review (Thursday, 17 January)

Guillaume Ludwig

Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 25 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 25 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Thursday, 24 January)

Hallvord R. M. Steen

Re: Versioning and html[5] (Friday, 25 January)
Re: [WF2] new attributes that often conflict with actual pages (Friday, 18 January)
[WF2] new attributes that often conflict with actual pages (Wednesday, 16 January)
[WF2] form.submit() should not throw if form is invalid (Wednesday, 16 January)
[WF2] backwards compatibility with values of custom required attributes (Wednesday, 16 January)

Henri Sivonen

Re: Validation error frequencies (Thursday, 31 January)
Validation error frequencies (Thursday, 31 January)
Re: ISSUE-29 (scope-uri-schemes): Should the HTML 5 specification introduce URI schemes such as javascript:? [HTML Principles/Requirements] (Wednesday, 23 January)
Re: prose content and del elements (typo?) (Sunday, 20 January)
Re: DogFood (Monday, 14 January)
Re: DogFood (Sunday, 13 January)
Contexts in which <menu> is allowed (Saturday, 12 January)
Re: <style scoped> and semi-transparent content models (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: <style scoped> and semi-transparent content models (Thursday, 10 January)
<style scoped> and semi-transparent content models (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Underline element. (Saturday, 5 January)
usemap and case-sensitivity (Friday, 4 January)

Howard Cary Morris

Suggestions for improvement (Saturday, 12 January)
Suffestions for improvement (Saturday, 12 January)

HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker

ISSUE-29 (scope-uri-schemes): Should the HTML 5 specification introduce URI schemes such as javascript:? [HTML Principles/Requirements] (Wednesday, 23 January)
ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] (Wednesday, 23 January)

Ian B. Jacobs

Call for Exclusions: HTML 5; HTML 5 differences from HTML 4 (Tuesday, 22 January)

Ian Hickson

Re: Javascript URI scheme (ACTION-46) (Friday, 25 January)
Re: HTML 5 WD (not technical) (Thursday, 24 January)
Re: HTML 5 WD (not technical) (Thursday, 24 January)
Re: HTML 5 WD (not technical) (Thursday, 24 January)
Re: [WF2] new attributes that often conflict with actual pages (Wednesday, 16 January)
HTML vs XHTML issue (Monday, 14 January)
Changes to the Status of this Document section to address recent feedback (Sunday, 13 January)

Ivan Enderlin

Underline element issue. (Wednesday, 23 January)
Re: <?doctype ?> instead of <!doctype > (Tuesday, 8 January)

j.j.

Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (<image>) (Friday, 25 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 25 January)
Re: Graceful degradation of sectioning elements (Thursday, 24 January)

James Graham

Re: ISSUE-20 (table-headers): Improvements to the table-headers algorithm in the HTML 5 spec [HTML 5 spec] (Monday, 28 January)
Re: Header cell in top left of data tables (Sunday, 27 January)
Re: Please change the current name of the specification to "HTML5 and XHTML5" (Tuesday, 15 January)
Re: Please change the current name of the specification to "HTML5 and XHTML5" (Tuesday, 15 January)
Order of nodes from getElementsByClassName (Friday, 4 January)

Jeff Schiller

Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Monday, 28 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 25 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 25 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 25 January)
img issue: should we restrict the URI (Thursday, 24 January)

Jim Jewett

Re: Underline element minor points (Monday, 14 January)

Jirka Kosek

Re: Please change the current name of the specification to "HTML5 and XHTML5" (Tuesday, 15 January)

Jon Barnett

Re: IMG tag (Tuesday, 15 January)

Joshue O Connor

Re: iframe@security (Monday, 21 January)
Re: iframe@security (Monday, 21 January)
Re: iframe@security (Monday, 21 January)
Re: iframe@security (Monday, 21 January)
Re: Please change the current name of the specification to "HTML5 and XHTML5" (Wednesday, 16 January)

Julian Reschke

Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] (Friday, 25 January)
Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] (Friday, 25 January)
Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] (Friday, 25 January)
Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] (Friday, 25 January)
Re: HTML WG Action-46: javascript scheme (Friday, 25 January)
Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] (Friday, 25 January)
Re: Javascript URI scheme (ACTION-46) (Friday, 25 January)
Javascript URI scheme (ACTION-46) (Friday, 25 January)
Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] (Thursday, 24 January)

Karl Dubost

Re: Please change the current name of the specification to "HTML5 and XHTML5" (Wednesday, 16 January)
RDFa Re: Underline element. (Monday, 7 January)
Re: Underline element. (Wednesday, 2 January)

Lachlan Hunt

Re: Please change the current name of the specification to "HTML5 and XHTML5" (Tuesday, 15 January)
Re: Reminder for organizations to vote (Friday, 11 January)
Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5 (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft? ISSUE-19 (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Underline element. (Sunday, 6 January)

Laurens Holst

Re: [whatwg] WF2 - <form action=""> (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: [whatwg] WF2 - <form action=""> (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: [WF2] new attributes that often conflict with actual pages (Wednesday, 16 January)

liorean

Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Tuesday, 29 January)
Re: HTML5 and XML syntax (Monday, 28 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Sunday, 27 January)

Maciej Stachowiak

Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] (Saturday, 26 January)
Re: HTML 5 WD (not technical) (Thursday, 24 January)
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft? ISSUE-19 (Saturday, 19 January)
Reminder for organizations to vote (was Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft? ISSUE-19) (Friday, 11 January)
Re: New Input type proposal (Friday, 11 January)
Re: Underline element. (Friday, 4 January)
Re: Order of nodes from getElementsByClassName (Friday, 4 January)
Re: Underline element. (Wednesday, 2 January)

Mark Baker

Re: HTML WG Action-46: javascript scheme (Friday, 25 January)
Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] (Thursday, 24 January)
Re: ISSUE-29 (scope-uri-schemes): Should the HTML 5 specification introduce URI schemes such as javascript:? [HTML Principles/Requirements] (Wednesday, 23 January)
Re: ISSUE-29 (scope-uri-schemes): Should the HTML 5 specification introduce URI schemes such as javascript:? [HTML Principles/Requirements] (Wednesday, 23 January)

Martin Atkins

Re: New Input type proposal (Thursday, 10 January)

Matthew Raymond

Issues with <input type="hash"> (was Re: New Input type proposal) (Wednesday, 16 January)

Michael(tm) Smith

{minutes} HTML WG teleconference 2008-01-24 (Thursday, 24 January)
Re: iframe@security (Monday, 21 January)
Re: Reminder for organizations to vote (Saturday, 12 January)

Mihai Sucan

Re: Detailed review of 3.12.10. The time element (Saturday, 12 January)
Re: Detailed review of 4.11. Client-side persistent storage (Friday, 11 January)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Proposed HTML ping attribute (Tuesday, 15 January)

Olivier GENDRIN

Re: Header cell in top left of data tables (Tuesday, 29 January)
Re: Header cell in top left of data tables (Monday, 28 January)
Re: Header cell in top left of data tables (Monday, 28 January)
Re: Underline element. (Monday, 14 January)
Re: Underline element. (Monday, 14 January)
Re: New Input type proposal (Friday, 11 January)
Re: Underline element. (Monday, 7 January)
Re: RDFa Re: Underline element. (Monday, 7 January)
Re: Underline element. (Wednesday, 2 January)

Patrick Garies

Re: Underline element. (Monday, 14 January)
Re: Underline element. (Monday, 14 January)
Re: Underline element. (Monday, 14 January)
Re: Underline element. (Monday, 14 January)
Re: Underline element. (Monday, 14 January)
Re: Underline element. (Wednesday, 2 January)

Patrick H. Lauke

Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Thursday, 24 January)
Re: iframe@security (Saturday, 19 January)
Re: Issues with <input type="hash"> (was Re: New Input type proposal) (Wednesday, 16 January)
Re: Underline element. (Sunday, 6 January)
Re: Underline element. (Friday, 4 January)

Peter Krantz

Re: Underline element. (Monday, 14 January)
Re: Underline element. (Monday, 14 January)
RDFa use cases (was: Underline element.) (Sunday, 6 January)
Re: Underline element. (Saturday, 5 January)
Re: Underline element. (Friday, 4 January)

Philip Taylor

Re: Graceful degradation of sectioning elements (Wednesday, 23 January)
Canvas path transformations (Wednesday, 16 January)
Re: New Input type proposal (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft? ISSUE-19 (Wednesday, 9 January)
Re: Underline element. (Tuesday, 8 January)
Re: RDFa use cases (was: Underline element.) (Tuesday, 8 January)
Re: Underline element. (Wednesday, 2 January)

Philip Taylor (Webmaster)

Re: Regarding the <abbr> tag (Tuesday, 29 January)
Re: Regarding the <abbr> tag (Monday, 28 January)
Re: Please change the current name of the specification to "HTML5 and XHTML5" (Tuesday, 15 January)
Re: Underline element. (Monday, 14 January)
Re: Underline element. (Monday, 14 January)
Re: Underline element. (Monday, 14 January)
Re: Underline element. (Wednesday, 9 January)

Preston L. Bannister

Re: New Input type proposal (Wednesday, 16 January)
Re: New Input type proposal (Friday, 11 January)
Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG (Thursday, 10 January)

Richard Conyard

RE: iframe@security (Monday, 21 January)

Richard Ishida

RE: lang and RFC3066 (Tuesday, 29 January)

Roy T. Fielding

Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] (Friday, 25 January)
Re: HTML 5 WD (not technical) (Thursday, 24 January)

Sam Kuper

Re: Suggestions for improvement (Monday, 21 January)
Re: Suggestions for improvement (Monday, 21 January)

Sam Ruby

Re: Validation error frequencies (Thursday, 31 January)
Re: DogFood (Monday, 14 January)

Samuel Santos

Re: Versioning and html[5] (Tuesday, 22 January)
Re: input type="file" problems (Monday, 14 January)
Re: input type="file" problems (Monday, 14 January)
input type="file" problems (Monday, 14 January)

Simon Pieters

Re: 3.8.3. The nav element (Saturday, 19 January)
Re: Case-sensitivity of attribute values wrt Selectors (Tuesday, 8 January)
Case-sensitivity of attribute values wrt Selectors (Saturday, 5 January)

Smylers

Re: HTML5 draft: id attribute question (Saturday, 26 January)
Re: Versioning and html[5] (Tuesday, 22 January)

Sylvain Eliade

Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG (Thursday, 10 January)

T.V Raman

Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] (Friday, 25 January)

Thierry Michel

SMIL Timesheets 1.0 Last Call Transition Announcement (Monday, 14 January)

Thomas Pike

Re: New Input type proposal (Thursday, 10 January)

Tom Morris

Re: RDFa Re: Underline element. (Monday, 7 January)
Re: Underline element. (Sunday, 6 January)

Wesley.Upchurch@semcoinc.com

Re: Regarding the <abbr> tag (Tuesday, 29 January)
Re: Regarding the <abbr> tag (Monday, 28 January)
Re: Regarding the <abbr> tag (Thursday, 24 January)
Re: HTML 5 WD (not technical) (Wednesday, 23 January)
IMG tag (Tuesday, 15 January)
Re: Please change the current name of the specification to "HTML5 and XHTML5" (Tuesday, 15 January)

Yann

Re: [whatwg] Video codec requirements changed (Saturday, 12 January)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 January 2008 23:52:29 UTC