On another related note, David Hyatt of Apple, Inc. is not listed on the WHATWG version of the Working Draft, but is listed on the W3C version. I think this could give the appearance that the W3C and WHATWG aren't working in unity, plus it's my opinion that David deserves his fair credit (but maybe there's another reason he's been excluded, that I'm unaware of). I agree and I realize that the WHATWG has contributed a number of contributions and their work to the completion of this WD and deserve acknowledgement, but I see no reason why the W3C WG deserves less credit. - Wesley Upchurch Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> Sent by: public-html-request@w3.org 01/23/2008 09:35 AM To "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org> cc Subject HTML 5 WD (not technical) This is not a technical comment but still... I just cannot believe this WD mentions all the WHATWG contributors in the ACK section but does not even mention the HTML WG itself, its chairmen, the W3C members in that WG and so on. It's also not the habit to have nicknames in a W3C WD ACK section (ask fantasai about it). </Daniel>Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2008 17:38:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:08 GMT