Tom Morris wrote: > Unless HTML 5 starts supporting some kind of embedded RDF solution > (RDFa, head/@profile for GRDDL), I will not use it and continue to > publish HTML 4 and XHTML 1.0/1.1 instead - and suggest to people that > they avoid publishing HTML 5. I don’t know why you wouldn’t be able to use those technologies even if they weren’t requirements of HTML 5, barring UA support, of course. For RDFa, you could just extend the language with new attributes since there’s no technical limitation (i.e., there’s no DTD). For GRDDL, you could do the same thing; in a namespaced XML document, you would have the additional option of using the profile attribute from the XHTML namespace. — Patrick GariesReceived on Monday, 14 January 2008 18:02:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:11 GMT