Preston L. Bannister wrote: > Folks, you are re-inventing the wheel, and repeating classic mistakes. As far as the technology used to implement the system is concerned, yes. Generally however the proposal does not want to introduce a brand new technique but rather only wants to define a new input type. > > There is a lack. It is (or should be) possible to do secure logins across > unencrypted channels. What is needed is access to an encryption library from > Javascript. That would be outside to scope of the HTML specification. Eventually yes, but this is already mostly covered by SSL. However, as mentioned this isnt primarily to have a new encryption standard to programming interface, but rather to have a defined HTML element which tells the client to preprocess its data in a certain way. Alexander -- Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten Browser-Versionen downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/browserReceived on Monday, 14 January 2008 10:16:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:08 GMT