Patrick Garies wrote: > I don’t know why you > would propose “familyname” instead of “surname” though. According to > http://www.m-w.com/ [1], the term family name is a synonym of the term > surname; the definition of the term surname is “an added name derived > from occupation or other circumstance”, which seems pretty generic to me > [2]. I don’t know which languages/cultures “surname” would be > inapplicable to. Fair comment. For reasons that are no longer clear, I was under the impression that a surname always /followed/ a given name; I can find no evidence to support this, so I withdraw my objection without reservation. "Familyname" may, however, be more transparent to non-native speakers. Philip TAYLORReceived on Monday, 14 January 2008 22:36:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:32:24 GMT