Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI

Dr. Olaf Hoffmann wrote:

> object is more a generic element for problematic cases, if nothing
> else describes the purpose of the content better. Maybe authors
> have to use attributes like role/class to specify it better.

OK, I agree.

> No, if it has the same functionality than object, authors have
> the chance to provide alternative content in different formats
> and if the viewer/user-agent provides an interface, the
> reader/user may chose what is the best 'display' for
> the intended purpose and his access to the problem.

Exactly the same way as the object element ? For example we 
have an image, and a text alternative, then an audio alternative ?


Guillaume

-- 
Guillaume LUDWIG - GMLi