W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Regarding the <abbr> tag

From: Philip Taylor (Webmaster) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:59:10 +0000
Message-ID: <479F696E.1030302@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: Wesley.Upchurch@semcoinc.com
CC: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>

Wesley.Upchurch@semcoinc.com wrote:

> But] I don't really see the point of your argument (I just 
> used that as an example because I was replying to some who, improperly 
> used it as an example.) 

Only that it's difficult to discuss how one might
best handle acronyms if the example cited is not one !

Philip TAYLOR

Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 17:59:32 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: liorean: "Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI"
Previous message: Richard Ishida: "RE: lang and RFC3066"
In reply to: Wesley.Upchurch@semcoinc.com: "Re: Regarding the <abbr> tag"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:08 GMT