Tuesday, 30 April 2002
- Re: Complex Type extension
- RE: Complex Type extension
- Complex Type extension
- ANNOUNCE: Translator from XSD regex syntax to Java regex syntax
Monday, 29 April 2002
Tuesday, 30 April 2002
Monday, 29 April 2002
- RE: Restricting a union? was RE: Schema for schemas bugs?
- XML Schema built in simple type definition location
- facets on anySimpleType
- Re: [Moderator Action] About the schema for schema........
Sunday, 28 April 2002
- Re: Restricting a union? was RE: Schema for schemas bugs?
- RE: Restricting a union? was RE: Schema for schemas bugs?
Friday, 26 April 2002
Saturday, 27 April 2002
- Re: final on element declaration
- Re: duplicate schemalocation keys
- Re: attribute required in base type/prohibited in derived type
Friday, 26 April 2002
- final on element declaration
- RE: W3C xml.xsd schema
- duplicate schemalocation keys
- W3C xml.xsd schema
- attribute required in base type/prohibited in derived type
- Re: The usage of nillable
- The usage of nillable
- Modifying XML Instance Document From A Schema Validation
- XML Schema for SAP IDOC mbgmcr02
- Re: Restricting a union? was RE: Schema for schemas bugs?
- Re: Restricting a union? was RE: Schema for schemas bugs?
- Restricting a union? was RE: Schema for schemas bugs?
- Re: Are Schema import statements transitive?
- Are Schema import statements transitive?
Thursday, 25 April 2002
Friday, 26 April 2002
Thursday, 25 April 2002
- Re: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- RE: [Moderator Action] ambigous string
- Re: [Moderator Action] ambigous string
- Re: XML Schema validation using XERCES --- the correct mailing list to get this question answered...
- Re: Schema for schemas bugs?
- XML Schema validation using XERCES
- RE: import/include
- import/include
Wednesday, 24 April 2002
- Re: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- RE: schema processors
- Re: schema processors
- RE: Schema for schemas bugs?
- RE: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- Re: Schema for schemas bugs?
- xmlspy validation bug with cos-element-consistent
- Defining a New Construct
Tuesday, 23 April 2002
- Re: Schema reader
- Re: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- Re: Please help
- RE: Schema for schemas bugs?
- RE: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- RE: Schema for schemas bugs?
- Re: Schema for schemas bugs?
- schema processors
- Re: Schema for schemas bugs?
- Re: Schema for schemas bugs?
Monday, 22 April 2002
- Re: Schema for schemas bugs?
- Re: [xml-dev] which xml schema tools do it right concerning including attributes xml:lang and xml:space
- Re: Date type and patterns
- RE: Date type and patterns
Friday, 19 April 2002
Monday, 22 April 2002
- Re: [Moderator Action] Date type and patterns
- Re: Mixed Content + List?
- Re: Mixed Content + List?
- Mixed Content + List?
- Re: [xml-dev] which xml schema tools do it right concerning including attributes xml:lang and xml:space
Sunday, 21 April 2002
- Re: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- Re: Renaming elements???
- Re: uniqueness question
- uniqueness question
Saturday, 20 April 2002
Friday, 19 April 2002
- RE: [xml-dev] which xml schema tools do it right concerning including attributes xml:lang and xml:space
- RE: [xml-dev] which xml schema tools do it right concerning including attributes xml:lang and xml:space
- RE: [xml-dev] which xml schema tools do it right concerning including attributes xml:lang and xml:space
- RE: [xml-dev] which xml schema tools do it right concerning including attributes xml:lang and xml:space
- Re: [xml-dev] which xml schema tools do it right concerning including attributes xml:lang and xml:space
- Re: [xml-dev] which xml schema tools do it right concerning including attributes xml:lang and xml:space
- Re: [xml-dev] which xml schema tools do it right concerning including attributes xml:lang and xml:space
- Re: Pls do the need full
- Re: Interpretation of a choice element
- Re: [xml-dev] which xml schema tools do it right concerning including attributes xml:lang and xml:space
- Pls do the need full
- Interpretation of a choice element
Thursday, 18 April 2002
- RE: Usage of compositors and groups
- RE: Usage of compositors and groups
- RE: [xml-dev] which xml schema tools do it right concerning including attributes xml:lang and xml:space
- Usage of compositors and groups
- RE: validation problem with xerces 2
- Re: [xml-dev] which xml schema tools do it right concerning including attributes xml:lang and xml:space
- Re: Group elements???
Wednesday, 17 April 2002
- Re: validation problem with xerces 2
- Group elements???
- Re: [xml-dev] which xml schema tools do it right concerning including attributes xml:lang and xml:space
- Re: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- RE: [xml-dev] which xml schema tools do it right concerning including attributes xml:lang and xml:space
- Re: [xml-dev] which xml schema tools do it right concerning including attributes xml:lang and xml:space
- RE: [xml-dev] which xml schema tools do it right concerning including attributes xml:lang and xml:space
- RE: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- RE: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- RE: [xml-dev] which xml schema tools do it right concerning including attributes xml:lang and xml:space
- RE: [xml-dev] which xml schema tools do it right concerning including attributes xml:lang and xml:space
- Re: ANN: JARV driver for Xerces-2 XML Schema validator
- RE: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- Re: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- RE: schema validation error
- RE: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- RE: schema validation error
- Re: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- RE: schema validation error
Tuesday, 16 April 2002
Wednesday, 17 April 2002
- ANN: JARV driver for Xerces-2 XML Schema validator
- can an attribute prohibited by restriction be added back through a subsequent extension?
- Re: Schema for schemas bugs?
Tuesday, 16 April 2002
- RE: schema validation error
- RE: parsing a xml file against the schema
- RE: parsing a xml file against the schema
- RE: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- Re: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- parsing a xml file against the schema
- Re: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- Re: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- RE: Help me please
- RE: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- RE: Help me please
- Re: Help me please
- Re: Schema for schemas bugs?
- Help me please
Monday, 15 April 2002
Tuesday, 16 April 2002
- Re: attribute declaration
- Re: attribute declaration
- attribute declaration
- Re: Conditional processing im schema!!
- Re: [xmlschema-dev] <none>
- Re: Schema for schemas bugs?
Monday, 15 April 2002
- RE: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- Re: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- Re: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- Re: Is name attribute essential in an attribute
- Is name attribute essential in an attribute
- schema validation error
- Re: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- Re: xs:choice problem
- Is anySimpleType a valid Simple Type Definition?
- Re: Schema for schemas bugs?
- Re: reference to root element
- Re: Conditional processing im schema!!
Thursday, 11 April 2002
Wednesday, 10 April 2002
- xs:choice problem
- Schema for validate an auto-generated file with ADO
- Conditional processing im schema!!
Friday, 5 April 2002
Monday, 15 April 2002
- Re: is the best/only way to restrict the values of an attribute
- RE: is the best/only way to restrict the values of an attribute
- is the best/only way to restrict the values of an attribute
Friday, 12 April 2002
- Re: conplexType with mixed="true" and no content.
- Re: conplexType with mixed="true" and no content.
- Re: Schema for schemas bugs?
- Re: Schema for schemas bugs?
- Re: Schema for schemas bugs?
Thursday, 11 April 2002
- RE: conplexType with mixed="true" and no content.
- Re: conplexType with mixed="true" and no content.
- conplexType with mixed="true" and no content.
- conplexType with mixed="true" and no content.
- Re: Attribute Problem!!
- Re: [Schematron-love-in] Is it possible to write a schematron rule which validate the number of occurence of a list ?
Wednesday, 10 April 2002
- RE: Prohibited Attributes and Attribute Wildcards
- Attribute Problem!!
- Prohibited Attributes and Attribute Wildcards
- Re: Question on abstract element
- Re: Question on abstract element
- Question on abstract element
- RE: Need help with an XPath expression in XSLT
- Re: Need help with an XPath expression in XSLT
- Need help with an XPath expression in XSLT
- Re: Selector Clarification
- Re: Selector Clarification
- Schema for schemas bugs?
Tuesday, 9 April 2002
Wednesday, 10 April 2002
Tuesday, 9 April 2002
Monday, 8 April 2002
- Specify XML Schema Manually
- Re: Selector Clarification
- Re: Selector Clarification
- Selector Clarification
Saturday, 6 April 2002
Friday, 5 April 2002
Thursday, 4 April 2002
Friday, 5 April 2002
Thursday, 4 April 2002
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing]]
- RE: How can I create XML schema by code?
- Regular expression library
- Re: validator crash during target reading
Wednesday, 3 April 2002
Thursday, 4 April 2002
Wednesday, 3 April 2002
- Re: Unions and Enumerations
- Unions and Enumerations
- Re: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- Re: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- Re: union of a union legal?
- Re: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- RE: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- XML and XSD from a string in java
- Resend: Re: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- Re: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
Tuesday, 2 April 2002
- Re: union of a union legal?
- Modelling Java Classes in XSD
- Re: [Gml30.rwg] RE: [RESEND] Derivation by restriction
Wednesday, 3 April 2002
- Re: FW: [RESEND] Derivation by restriction
- FW: [RESEND] Derivation by restriction
- Re: Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- RE: [RESEND] Derivation by restriction
- RE: [Gml30.rwg] RE: [RESEND] Derivation by restriction
Tuesday, 2 April 2002
- Schema Design: Composition vs Subclassing
- RE: [RESEND] Derivation by restriction
- Re: [RESEND] Derivation by restriction
- RE: puzzling over use="prohibited"
- Re: puzzling over use="prohibited"
- puzzling over use="prohibited"
- Re: xs:import question
- Re: Problem with UNIQUE constraint
- Re: [RESEND] Derivation by restriction
- Re: [RESEND] Derivation by restriction
- RE: [RESEND] Derivation by restriction
Monday, 1 April 2002
- Re: Typos in schema definition
- Redefining the same document multiple times through different include paths
- Re: Attribute Fixed and Prohibited
- Re: xs:all - why is minOccurs, maxOccurs restricted to "0" or "1" for child xs:element ?
- Re: [RESEND] Derivation by restriction
- RE: [RESEND] Derivation by restriction