RE: schema processors

The list of available schema processors is available from the W3C at
http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema 
Speaking of which I didn't notice a mention of the .NET
XmlValidatingReader class. 

PS: If you are interested in testing I suggest taking a look at the W3C
XML Schema Test Collection
(http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-test-collection.html) 

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Some of us can remember anything, whether it happened or not. 
 
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 
You assume all risk for your use. (c) 2002 Microsoft Corporation. All
rights reserved.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Schloss [mailto:rschloss@us.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:47 PM
> To: Ibrahim Ahmed
> Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> Subject: Re: schema processors
> 
> 
> 
> I suggest you look at Xerces-C and Xerces-J.
> See http://xml.apache.org .
> 
> I hope that whatever approach you take, you document what you 
> find on this list.
> 
> Bob Schloss
> Extensible Technologies
> IBM T J Watson Research Center
> Yorktown Heights, New York, USA
> 
> 
> Ibrahim Ahmed <i.ahmed@tu-harburg.de>@w3.org on 04/23/2002 05:54:30 AM
> 
> Sent by:    xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org
> 
> 
> To:    xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> cc:
> Subject:    schema processors
> 
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I have an urgent problem for which i need your help.
> During course of a project work, I need to analyse the 
> perfomance and their conformation to the XML Schema 
> specification of some important schema processors. Can anyone 
> please give me some  help in this regard. What are the 
> important schema processors available(I know about XSV, MSV 
> and one from
> 
> Topology) How should I proceed with problem, are their some 
> established performance criterion or tests or tool available 
> to test the processors(I found some material on www.w3.org 
> but it is not enough). Or
> 
> may be you can give me some link on web where i can find 
> relevant information or work related to this.
> 
> Your help is greatly appreciated.
> Thanks.
> Ahmed
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2002 16:33:29 UTC