- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 06:28:26 -0400 (EDT)
- To: jeni@jenitennison.com
- Cc: dareo@microsoft.com (Dare Obasanjo), paul_hermans@protext.be (Paul Hermans), xml-dev@lists.xml.org, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Jeni Tennison scripsit: > (basic XML 1.0 well-formedness > parsing should give a warning if xml:lang isn't a language code, I > think). No, the production rules given for xml:lang values in the First Edition were not actually linked to any other production rules, and were removed by erratum, as shown in the Second Edition. So <foo xml:lang="$@#$"/> is in fact well-formed and valid, though semantically bad. -- John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> http://www.reutershealth.com I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
Received on Friday, 19 April 2002 06:28:37 UTC