- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 16:23:14 -0400
- To: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, "Stanley Guan" <stanley.guan@oracle.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
I've only followed some of this thread. That said: isn't it reasonable
that I might want to define xml:lang, for purposes of my schema, as being
an enumeration of say {en,fr}? Why prevent that?
I think it would be a good thing if many parsers took switches to force
loading of particular schemas, to force schemaLocation to be honored on
import, etc. Of course, there can be no conflict among (global)
definitions of a given element or attribute.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 19 April 2002 16:40:39 UTC