xml-dist-app@w3.org from December 2000 by date

Sunday, 31 December 2000

Happy New Year Rakesh Nanda

Friday, 29 December 2000

Re: DR309 -- ongoing discussion Martin Gudgin
DR305 -- ongoing discussion David Ezell
DR309 -- ongoing discussion David Ezell

Wednesday, 27 December 2000

Re: MSIE/Mac in P2P mode Rohit Khare
Re: MSIE/Mac in P2P mode Susan Lesch
MIME marking for SOAP and XP (was text/xml for SOAP (and XP) con sidered harmful) Andrew Layman
application/something+xml (was text/xml for SOAP (and XP) conside red harmful) Andrew Layman
MSIE/Mac in P2P mode Dave Winer

Tuesday, 26 December 2000

RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Larry Masinter
RE: New Scenario Octav Chipara

Monday, 25 December 2000

RE: New Scenario Dick Brooks
New Scenario Octav Chipara

Saturday, 23 December 2000

RE: Proposed revised wording of 6.3 preamble Krishna Sankar

Friday, 22 December 2000

RE: Proposed revised wording of 6.3 preamble Anderson, William L
Re: Proposed revised wording of 6.3 preamble Martin Gudgin
Re: [DS5] Request with transport level response Jeffrey Kay
Re: Proposed revised wording of 6.3 preamble Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: Strawman: Abstract Model for XP David Ezell
[xml-dist-app] <none> Stephane MBAYE
DS8 marwan sabbouh
DS5 marwan sabbouh
DS2 marwan sabbouh
DS1 marwan sabbouh
Re: Strawman: Abstract Model for XP Jean-Jacques Moreau
Rational behind rewording of sender and receiver Martin Gudgin
Proposed revised wording for XP receiver Martin Gudgin
Proposed revised wording for XP sender Martin Gudgin
Proposed revised wording of 6.3 preamble Martin Gudgin

Thursday, 21 December 2000

Re: [DS4] Remote Procedure Call (RPC) Paul Denning
Re: [DS4] Remote Procedure Call (RPC) Paul Denning
Sun position on SOAP and ebXML Anne Thomas Manes
RE: [DS1] Fire-and-forget to single receiver Mark Needleman - DRA
RE: [DS1] Fire-and-forget to single receiver Dick Brooks
Re: [DS2] Fire-and-forget to multiple receivers Paul Denning
Re: [DS1] Fire-and-forget to single receiver Paul Denning
Re: Strawman: Abstract Model for XP David Ezell
[DS15] Communication via an intermediary john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
[DS10] Message header and payload encryption john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
[DS14] Quality of service provision john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
[DS16] Asynchronous messaging john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
[DS9] Message data signature and encryption john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
[DS12] Communication via heterogeneous transports john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
[DS11] Communication via multiple intermediaries john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
Re: [DS1] Fire-and-forget to single receiver Mark Needleman - DRA
[DS8] Conversational message exchange john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
[DS7] Third party intermediary john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
[DS6] Request with encrypted payload john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
[DS5] Request with transport level response john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
[DS1] Fire-and-forget to single receiver john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
[DS4] Remote Procedure Call (RPC) john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
[DS3] Request-response john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
[DS2] Fire-and-forget to multiple receivers john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com

Wednesday, 20 December 2000

example usage scenarios and use cases Paul Cotton
RE: Comments on XML Protocol Reqs Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Re: SOAP spec.: HTTP binding John Wilson
RE: use case [SAX-style XP handlers] Andy Neilson
Comments on XML Protocol Reqs Martin J. Duerst
Re: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp

Tuesday, 19 December 2000

XML Protocol Requirements published as a W3C Working Draft Hugo Haas
RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Andrew Layman
use case [multiple, asynchronous response patterns] Mark A. Jones
use case [communication libaries and application data] Mark A. Jones
use case [thin clients and binary/application data] Mark A. Jones
Re: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Mark Baker
use case [SAX-style XP handlers] Mark A. Jones
RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Andrew Layman
RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Andrew Layman
Re: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Mark Baker
Re: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp
RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp
RE: SOAP spec.: HTTP binding Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

Monday, 18 December 2000

RE: SOAP spec.: HTTP binding Andy Neilson
RE: SOAP spec.: HTTP binding Kevin Koch
RE: SOAP spec.: HTTP binding Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
SOAP spec.: HTTP binding Kevin Koch
Re: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Mark Baker
Dec 6 teleconference minutes Hugo Haas
RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

Saturday, 16 December 2000

RE: [Fwd: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful] Dick Brooks
RE: [Fwd: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful] James Snell
RE: [Fwd: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful] Dick Brooks
[xml-dist-app] <none> WEERASOORIA,Senaka

Friday, 15 December 2000

RE: DR027: Audit trails Paul Denning

Thursday, 14 December 2000

RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp

Wednesday, 13 December 2000

RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Andrew Layman
RE: DR027: Audit trails Krishna Sankar
RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Mike Dierken
RE: DR027: Audit trails Henry Lowe
validating an xml file syed kabeer
RE: Response to "On the use of HTTP as a Substrate for Other Prot oco ls" Hall, Randy E
RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp
Re: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Oisin Hurley
RE: DR046 -- Application Semantics and Security Oisin Hurley
RE: DR125: Defining app layer semantics Oisin Hurley
RE: DR051 and DR006: Identification of message Oisin Hurley
RE: [R608] and digital signatures Oisin Hurley
RE: DR027: Audit trails Oisin Hurley
RE: DR065 Oisin Hurley
RE: DR033: UI interactions Oisin Hurley
RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Burdett, David

Tuesday, 12 December 2000

An error in the example in section 5.4.1? Mario Maccarini
RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Mark Baker - Ottawa Consumer and Embedded Div.
RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Andrew Layman
Re: Response to "On the use of HTTP as a Substrate for Other Protoco ls" Jeff.Hodges@kingsmountain.com
RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Mike Dierken
Re: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Mark Needleman - DRA
RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Dick Brooks
ebXML press release Dick Brooks
Re: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Larry Cable
RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Larry Masinter
Re: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Larry Cable
RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Larry Masinter
text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp

Monday, 11 December 2000

SOAP Messages with Attachments, W3C Submission David Fallside
Re: Which 4 orgs can set de jure standards (was RE: SOAP and ebXML) christopher ferris
Re: Which 4 orgs can set de jure standards (was RE: SOAP and ebXML) Henry Lowe
Re: Which 4 orgs can set de jure standards (was RE: SOAP and ebXML) Mark Needleman - DRA
Re: Which 4 orgs can set de jure standards (was RE: SOAP and ebXML) christopher ferris
Re: Which 4 orgs can set de jure standards (was RE: SOAP and ebXML) Olivier DUBUISSON
Re: Which 4 orgs can set de jure standards (was RE: SOAP and ebXML) christopher ferris
Which 4 orgs can set de jure standards (was RE: SOAP and ebXML) Tolkin, Steve

Sunday, 10 December 2000

CFP XML and Distributed Applications Fabio Arciniegas A.

Monday, 11 December 2000

Re: Intermediaries and remote URI references (was: RE: [DR008] - pass ing arbitrary content) Mark Nottingham
RE: Intermediaries and remote URI references (was: RE: [DR008] - pass ing arbitrary content) Satish Thatte
RE: Intermediaries and remote URI references (was: RE: [DR008] - pass ing arbitrary content) Satish Thatte
RE: Intermediaries and remote URI references (was: RE: [DR008] - pass ing arbitrary content) Burdett, David

Saturday, 9 December 2000

Re: SOAP and ebXML Christopher Ferris

Sunday, 10 December 2000

Re: Intermediaries and remote URI references (was: RE: [DR008] - pass ing arbitrary content) Mark Nottingham
RE: Intermediaries and remote URI references (was: RE: [DR008] - pass ing arbitrary content) Satish Thatte
Re: Intermediaries and remote URI references (was: RE: [DR008] - pass ing arbitrary content) Mark Nottingham

Saturday, 9 December 2000

Intermediaries and remote URI references (was: RE: [DR008] - pass ing arbitrary content) Satish Thatte
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Dick Brooks
f2f regrets mario.jeckle@daimlerchrysler.com
Another real world use case from the DCOM list; requirement for async processing in XP Dick Brooks
RE: SOAP and ebXML Dick Brooks
Feedback from ebXML's TRP Vice Chair RE: SOAP and ebXML Dick Brooks
RE: SOAP and ebXML Krishna Sankar
RE: SOAP and ebXML Dick Brooks

Friday, 8 December 2000

RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: SOAP and ebXML Nikola Stojanovic
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Andrew Layman
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Burdett, David
[R300] References have changed Hugo Haas
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Paul Denning
Re: SOAP and ebXML Ed Mooney
Re: SOAP and ebXML David Clay
RE: SOAP and ebXML Brian Eisenberg
RE: SOAP and ebXML Satish Thatte
RE: SOAP and ebXML Satish Thatte
Typical use case to consider - FW: [SOAP] SQL Image File in SOAP message Dick Brooks
RE: SOAP and ebXML Krishna Sankar
Re: SOAP and ebXML Larry Cable
RE: SOAP and ebXML john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
RE: SOAP and ebXML Brian Eisenberg
Redmond meeting directions john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
RE: SOAP and ebXML Satish Thatte
RE: SOAP and ebXML Satish Thatte

Thursday, 7 December 2000

RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Henry Lowe
Re: SOAP and ebXML Larry Cable
RE: SOAP and ebXML Burdett, David
RE: SOAP and ebXML Satish Thatte
New draft of the requirements document available Hugo Haas
RE: SOAP and ebXML Eric Newcomer
use case for XP -- revalue smart card David Ezell
[DR 008, 040] - Summary and proposal Kevin Mitchell
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content David E. Cleary
RE: SOAP and ebXML David E. Cleary
[DR609] feedback Randy Waldrop
RE: SOAP and ebXML James Snell
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Dick Brooks
RE: ebXML and XML Protocol Michael Brennan
ebXML and XML Protocol Burdett, David
RE: [DR304], [R502], [DR058], [DR025], [DR028], [DR067] and "mess age patterns" Mike Dierken
RE: SOAP and ebXML Burdett, David
SOAP and ebXML Michael Champion

Wednesday, 6 December 2000

[DR304], [R502], [DR058], [DR025], [DR028], [DR067] and "message patterns" Frank DeRose
[R608] and digital signatures Frank DeRose
15 & 29 Nov teleconference minutes Hugo Haas
RE: DR046 -- Application Semantics and Security Alex Ceponkus
RE: DR065 Alex Ceponkus
Section 4.3: edited requirements (rev. 2) Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: DR065 Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: DR058: Interaction patterns Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: DR109: Resources/object references Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: DR051 and DR006: Identification of message Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: DR 122: Mapping issues Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: DR 122: Mapping issues Yves Lafon
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Oisin Hurley
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Mark A. Jones
DR065 Alex Ceponkus
DR124: Application Semantics Alex Ceponkus
DR109: Resources/object references Alex Ceponkus
DR058: Interaction patterns Alex Ceponkus
DR033: UI interactions Alex Ceponkus
DR125: Defining app layer semantics Alex Ceponkus
DR027: Audit trails Alex Ceponkus
DR051 and DR006: Identification of message Alex Ceponkus
DR031: Routing Alex Ceponkus
DR069 -- RPC and Application Semantics Alex Ceponkus
DR046 -- Application Semantics and Security Alex Ceponkus
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Paul Denning
Response to "On the use of HTTP as a Substrate for Other Protoco ls" Hall, Randy E
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content David E. Cleary
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content David E. Cleary
What is the difference in using XML, Java applets and Html interms of Security and performance redae
RE: DR 28: Multicast and R502 (fwd) Yves Lafon
Re: [DR040] - Binary data Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: DR 28: Multicast and R502 Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: DR 122: Mapping issues Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: [DR040] - Binary data mario.jeckle@daimlerchrysler.com
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Dick Brooks
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Dick Brooks
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Andrew Layman
RE: [DR 609] I18N experts' view Martin J. Duerst

Tuesday, 5 December 2000

RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Mike Dierken
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Dick Brooks
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Oisin Hurley
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Oisin Hurley
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Oisin Hurley
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: DR 28: Multicast and R502 Frank DeRose
RE: [DR040] - Binary data Kevin Mitchell
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Kevin Mitchell
RE: [DR040] - Binary data Paul Denning
RE: DR 121: Additional transport services Oisin Hurley
Re: [DR 609] I18N experts' view Hugo Haas
RE: [DR040] - Binary data Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Anderson, William L
Re: DR 122: Mapping issues Henry Lowe
Re: DR 122: Mapping issues Yves Lafon
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Re: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Jean-Jacques Moreau
RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content David E. Cleary
RE: [DR040] - Binary data David E. Cleary
Re: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Kevin Mitchell
Re: [DR120] Compact Encoding and Compression Issues Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: [DR040] - Binary data Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: DR 121: Additional transport services Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: DR 22: raw TCP usage Jean-Jacques Moreau
RE: [DR 609] I18N experts' view Oisin Hurley
RE: [DR040] - Binary data Oisin Hurley
RE: DR 121: Additional transport services Oisin Hurley
RE: DR 123: HTTP-NG, out-of-order delivery Oisin Hurley
RE: DR 22: raw TCP usage Oisin Hurley
[DR 22, 25, 28, 122] Oisin Hurley

Monday, 4 December 2000

[DR120] Compact Encoding and Compression Issues amr.f.yassin@philips.com
[DR040] - Binary data Kevin Mitchell
[DR008] - passing arbitrary content Kevin Mitchell
Re: DR 122: Mapping issues Henry Lowe
[DR119] Binary data Kevin Mitchell
Re: DR 122: Mapping issues Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: [DR 609] I18N experts' view Martin J. Duerst
Re: DR 122: Mapping issues Henry Lowe

Friday, 1 December 2000

[DR 609] I18N experts' view Hugo Haas
Re: [DR 309] Vague? David Ezell
DR 121: Additional transport services Jean-Jacques Moreau
DR 123: HTTP-NG, out-of-order delivery Jean-Jacques Moreau
DR 122: Mapping issues Jean-Jacques Moreau
DR 22: raw TCP usage Jean-Jacques Moreau
DR 25: Multicast (again) Jean-Jacques Moreau
DR 28: Multicast Jean-Jacques Moreau

Last message date: Sunday, 31 December 2000 07:18:00 UTC