- From: Paul Denning <pauld@mitre.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 16:13:57 -0500
- To: Henry Lowe <hlowe@omg.org>, "Oisin Hurley" <ohurley@iona.com>
- Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-elliott-ldapext-spdna-recrecs-00.txt Although the draft above is for logging and auditing of LDAP, many of the requirements are applicable to audit trails by XP Intermediaries. Paul At 10:40 AM 2000-12-13, Henry Lowe wrote: >Audit trails are a requirement for many B2B applications >and this is in ebXML. Consolidation of duplicates is OK, >but it shouldn't be dropped entirely. > >Best regards, >Henry >---------------- >At 05:57 AM 12/13/2000 +0000, Oisin Hurley wrote: > > > >> DR027: "There must be a way to deal with audit trails of the > >> protocol flow." > >> > >> Duplicate of R807 > >> "Tracking - enabling message recipients to determine a message's path > >> through preceding intermediates" > >> > >> Drop? > > > >The XML protocol specification is not a place to deal specifically with > >protocol flow options - so I agree with the drop call. > > > >However it is possible, given the existence of intermediaries and their > >recognition of first-class citizens in the message delivery, to perform > >at least a basic form of auditing. > > > > --oh > > > >-- > >ohurley at iona dot com > >+353 1 637 2639 > >
Received on Friday, 15 December 2000 16:15:38 UTC