- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 23:39:26 +0100
- To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com>
- CC: David Fallside <fallside@us.ibm.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Henrik, Here's revision 2 of section 4.3. It does include comments that were made last night (my time) and earlier today. Do you think you could include it in draft 3, instead of the text I did sent yesterday? Jean-Jacques. DR 121 -------- The XML Protocol WG recognizes that a number of XML messaging proposals use protocols other than HTTP, for example SMTP or BEEP. Although the WG encourages individuals and organisations to develop such bindings for XP, it will only provide a binding for HTTP initially, unless enough interest is shown by WG members to develop other bindings, and enough time is available for that work. DR 122 -------- The XML Protocol WG anticipates that mapping XP onto existing application layer protocols, such as SMTP, may lead to scalability and security problems, or even semantic complications (in particular when the application semantics defined by those protocols interfere with the semantics defined by XP). The WG may thus issue a warning accordingly. DR 123 -------- Not using HTTP-NG; drop DR 25 ------- Dup DR 28; drop. DR 22 ------- The XML Procotol WG recognizes that, in certain cases, it may be useful to run XP directly on top of TCP. However, it will not provide a raw TCP binding. DR 28 ------- Already covered by DR 502; drop.
Received on Wednesday, 6 December 2000 17:39:11 UTC