RE: DR 121: Additional transport services

> You are right, it does fit well.
> 
> However, I am slightly worried of adding even more complexity to 
> an already
> complex requirement (isn't DR 612 three paragraphs long 
> already?). (Besides,
> isn't section 3 called "In-Scope Requirements", and aren't we 
> talking about an
> "Out-of-Scope Requirement"?)

I think it is a partnership of context+requirement rather than 
requirement alone. Can be very useful for spec readers, especially
when it hints at the reasons for decisions, like this one.

 --oh

--
ohurley at iona dot com
+353 1 637 2639 

Received on Tuesday, 5 December 2000 14:39:24 UTC