- From: Dick Brooks <dick@8760.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2000 08:43:09 -0600
- To: <ochipara@cse.unl.edu>, "XP" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Octav, I believe the scenario you describe may be represented by either of the following use cases: [DS16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2000Dec/0229.html [DS5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2000Dec/0221.html Dick Brooks Group 8760 110 12th Street North Birmingham, AL 35203 dick@8760.com 205-250-8053 Fax: 205-250-8057 http://www.8760.com/ InsideAgent - Empowering e-commerce solutions > -----Original Message----- > From: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org [mailto:xml-dist-app-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Octav Chipara > Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2000 7:27 PM > To: XP > Subject: New Scenario > > > Has anyone thought about a scenario in which the server is > supposed to do a > lot of work to complete a request? In this case a simple request/reply > pattern would not work because you would keep the port occupied without > having it to be. Is there any suggested communication pattern for such a > case? > > > - Octav >
Received on Monday, 25 December 2000 09:46:59 UTC