- From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:06:42 -0500
- To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Due to the updates in the latest version[1] of the draft requirements document, the references in R300 are wrong. Current text[2]: R300 (absorbs old DRs: DR023, DR0053, DR088) The requirements that XP support the use of layering and be modular, extensible, and transport independent imply that there is an architectural design model behind XP. This architecture and the extensibility framework must be explicitly defined (DR308 references modularity, DR302 and DR700 reference extensibility, DR502 and DR800 reference transport neutrality). In this context, layering refers to both XP's support of XP modules (the layer(s) "above") as well as the capability of XP to define services required (the layer(s) "below") for implementation across a variety of underlying protocols R300 references DR308, DR302, DR700, DR502, and DR800. DR308, DR302 and DR502 are now R308, R302 and R502. DR700 was split into R700a, R700b and R700c. R700a references extensibility. DR800 was dropped. I propose updating the text to: R300 (absorbs old DRs: DR023, DR0053, DR088) The requirements that XP support the use of layering and be modular, extensible, and transport independent imply that there is an architectural design model behind XP. This architecture and the extensibility framework must be explicitly defined (R308 references modularity, R302 and R700a reference extensibility, R502 reference transport neutrality). In this context, layering refers to both XP's support of XP modules (the layer(s) "above") as well as the capability of XP to define services required (the layer(s) "below") for implementation across a variety of underlying protocols 1. http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xp-reqs-03 2. http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xp-reqs-03#z300 -- Hugo Haas - W3C/MIT mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ - tel:+1-617-452-2092
Received on Friday, 8 December 2000 16:06:42 UTC