- From: Mike Dierken <mike@DataChannel.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:43:20 -0800
- To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 13 December 2000 12:44:06 UTC
> -----Original Message----- > From: Larry Masinter [mailto:LMM@acm.org] > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 9:59 AM > > Actually, SOAP should use > application/soap+xml > > -----Original Message----- > From: mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp [mailto:mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp] > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 9:54 PM > > NOTE: Section 14.1 of HTTP[RFC2616] does not support Accept > headers of the form "Accept: */*+xml" and so this header MUST NOT > be used in this way. Instead, content negotiation[RFC2703] could > potentially be used if an XML-based MIME type were needed. Question: When people say 'SOAP should use application/soap+xml' (or whatever mime type) - are we talking about the Accept header when SOAP is carried over HTTP? Or are we talking about a header in the Envelope which identifies the media type of the Body of the SOAP message? Mike
Received on Wednesday, 13 December 2000 12:44:06 UTC