Re: SOAP and ebXML

David, John, Satish, Krishna, Brian, et. al.,

I agree completely.

  -- Ed

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 12/8/00, 2:36:13 PM, David Clay <david.clay@oracle.com> wrote regarding 
Re: SOAP and ebXML:

> I completely agree with your assesment.  I think we should carefully look
> through our requirements doc to make sure that requirements for support 
of
> ebXML PTR (as we curently understand it) are included.   Of particular
> interest in this regard is Appendix C of the ebXML PTR draft, which  
contrasts
> MIME with current SOAP as packaging technologies.

> Having said this, there is no reason why we should not critically review 
the
> ebXML specification and suggest improvements.

> john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com wrote:

> > .
> >
> > The technical community involved in both camps believe that convergence 
via
> > XP is a no-brainer. Let's make that happen, then any political posturing
> > will be just that.
> >
> > John
> >
> > XML Technology and Messaging,
> > IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park,
> > Winchester, SO21 2JN
> >
> > Tel: (work) +44 (0)1962 815188        (home) +44 (0)1722 781271
> > Fax: +44 (0)1962 816898
> > Notes Id: John Ibbotson/UK/IBM
> > email: john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com

Received on Friday, 8 December 2000 15:17:47 UTC