- From: Ed Mooney <Ed.Mooney@Sun.COM>
- Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 20:18:05 GMT
- To: David Clay <david.clay@oracle.com>
- CC: john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com, Satish Thatte <satisht@microsoft.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
David, John, Satish, Krishna, Brian, et. al., I agree completely. -- Ed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< On 12/8/00, 2:36:13 PM, David Clay <david.clay@oracle.com> wrote regarding Re: SOAP and ebXML: > I completely agree with your assesment. I think we should carefully look > through our requirements doc to make sure that requirements for support of > ebXML PTR (as we curently understand it) are included. Of particular > interest in this regard is Appendix C of the ebXML PTR draft, which contrasts > MIME with current SOAP as packaging technologies. > Having said this, there is no reason why we should not critically review the > ebXML specification and suggest improvements. > john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com wrote: > > . > > > > The technical community involved in both camps believe that convergence via > > XP is a no-brainer. Let's make that happen, then any political posturing > > will be just that. > > > > John > > > > XML Technology and Messaging, > > IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, > > Winchester, SO21 2JN > > > > Tel: (work) +44 (0)1962 815188 (home) +44 (0)1722 781271 > > Fax: +44 (0)1962 816898 > > Notes Id: John Ibbotson/UK/IBM > > email: john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
Received on Friday, 8 December 2000 15:17:47 UTC