- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 13:09:11 -0800
- To: "Anderson, William L" <WAnderson@crt.xerox.com>, "David E. Cleary" <davec@progress.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
I agree - in fact we already have at least two requirements to that effect - 700[1] and 403[2] pretty much covers it. > David has a good point here. Furthermore, not all arbitrary > data is JPEG or > PNG. Scenarios exist today for distributed processing of > arbitrary data > streams (Xerox production printing solutions currently manage such > applications). So I think we should mention INDIRECT handling > of arbitrary > data as a req't. Doing this does not seem to constrain or > unduly burden the > protocol. Henrik [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xp-reqs-02#z700 [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xp-reqs-02#z403
Received on Tuesday, 5 December 2000 16:09:57 UTC