RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content

I agree - in fact we already have at least two requirements to that
effect - 700[1] and 403[2] pretty much covers it.

> David has a good point here. Furthermore, not all arbitrary 
> data is JPEG or
> PNG. Scenarios exist today for distributed processing of 
> arbitrary data
> streams (Xerox production printing solutions currently manage such
> applications). So I think we should mention INDIRECT handling 
> of arbitrary
> data as a req't. Doing this does not seem to constrain or 
> unduly burden the
> protocol.

Henrik

[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xp-reqs-02#z700
[2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xp-reqs-02#z403

Received on Tuesday, 5 December 2000 16:09:57 UTC