- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 11:03:47 -0800
- To: "Noah Mendelsohn" <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>, "Paul Denning" <pauld@mitre.org>
- Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
I certainly like tying it to the protocol binding in case it has to be tied at all. If I add a reference like "http://www.my.com/..." then there is no tying at all because the transfer it done completely outside that particular XP message instance. Of course the link can point to another XP message but that is then another XP message instance that doesn't say anything about the first XP message (at least at the XP message level). [DR6xx] Arbitrary content (to include binary data) outside the XP message shall be accommodated by the protocol binding or in a manner completely independent of that XP message. Henrik > Other than some slight hesitance about whether this is > consistent with our > charter, I like it. Certainly the focus on tying it to the > binding(s) > seems right.
Received on Wednesday, 6 December 2000 14:04:27 UTC