- From: Oisin Hurley <ohurley@iona.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 22:33:34 -0000
- To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Kevin Mitchell" <kevin.mitchell@xmls.com>
- Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
> Well, I think there is a subtle difference between DR 8 and DR 40: > > * DR 40 talks about binary content, such as a JPEG file. > * DR 8 talks about arbitrary (read non-XML) content, such as a > JPEG file > OR a text document. And we also have DR700... "The XP specification must define a mechanism or mechanisms that allow applications to submit application-specific content or information for delivery by XP" I think this can cover it - the application-content is a very nice phrase which can mean "anything at all". Given this, I think it is safe to drop both DR8 and DR40. cheers --oh -- ohurley at iona dot com +353 1 637 2639
Received on Tuesday, 5 December 2000 17:33:50 UTC