www-ws@w3.org from May 2003 by author

Allan Doyle

• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Friday, 30 May)

Anne Thomas Manes

• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Tuesday, 27 May)
• RE: Explaining visibility, take 54 (Sunday, 11 May)
• RE: Explaining visibility, take 54 (Friday, 9 May)

athman

• CFP: 1st International Conference on Service Oriented (Thursday, 29 May)

Benjamin Grosof

• [SWSL] some SWS resources incl. WWW-2003 panel and B. Grosof recent talks (Thursday, 29 May)
• some SWS resources incl. WWW-2003 panel and my recent talks (Thursday, 29 May)
• some thoughts on SWSL service profile concept and approach (Thursday, 8 May)

Bijan Parsia

• Re: Fwd: Re: DAML-S ProcessModel (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: Fwd: Re: DAML-S ProcessModel (Tuesday, 20 May)

Champion, Mike

• RE: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Friday, 30 May)
• RE: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Thursday, 29 May)
• Prediction is hard, especially about the future (was RE: Propose d issue; Visibility of Web services) (Wednesday, 28 May)
• RE: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Wednesday, 28 May)
• RE: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Tuesday, 27 May)
• RE: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Monday, 26 May)
• RE: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Monday, 26 May)

Christopher B Ferris

• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Saturday, 31 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Saturday, 31 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Friday, 30 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Wednesday, 28 May)

David Martin

• Re: Correspondance of Profile and Process IOPE's (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Process parameter description (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Fwd: Re: DAML-S ProcessModel (Tuesday, 27 May)
• [Fwd: Re: Questions about subsumption relationships for matchmaking] (Thursday, 22 May)
• Re: [DAML-S] About grounding of services (Thursday, 22 May)
• Re: Proposed Changes to Profile.daml (0.9) (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: Questions about subsumption relationships for matchmaking (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: Problem with damlsParameter (Tuesday, 6 May)
• Re: Clarification re DAML-S (Tuesday, 6 May)

David Orchard

• RE: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Saturday, 31 May)
• RE: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Friday, 30 May)
• RE: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Tuesday, 27 May)
• RE: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Tuesday, 27 May)

Dr. Wex

• Re: Meaning (Friday, 23 May)
• Re: Meaning (Thursday, 22 May)

Drew McDermott

• Re: Process parameter description (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Meaning (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Meaning (Friday, 23 May)
• Re: question: named vs. anonymous classes in creation of conditional outputs and effects (Thursday, 22 May)
• Meaning (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: process:sameValues redefined (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: question: named vs. anonymous classes in creation of conditional outputs and effects (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: DAML-S ProcessModel (Tuesday, 20 May)

Evgeny Beskrovny

• question about wsdl parsing (Wednesday, 14 May)

Geoff Arnold

• Re: Explaining visibility, take 54 (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: Explaining visibility, take 54 (Sunday, 11 May)
• Re: Explaining visibility, take 54 (Friday, 9 May)

Ghanem BENADJAOUD

• examples on WS (Tuesday, 20 May)

Ian Horrocks

• Re: Questions about subsumption relationships for matchmaking (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Questions about subsumption relationships for matchmaking (Tuesday, 6 May)

Jan Ortmann

• Process parameter description (Sunday, 25 May)
• Question concerning XSLT-Transformation in DAML-S 0.9 (Monday, 19 May)

Jeff Lansing

• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Friday, 30 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Friday, 30 May)
• Re: DAML-S ProcessModel (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: question about "xsltTransformation" property in DAML-S 0.9+ (Thursday, 8 May)

Joachim.Peer@unisg.ch

• [ANN]: XML <=> DL mapper tool, call for alpha testers (Wednesday, 28 May)
• [ANN]: XML -- DL mapping tool, call for testers (Thursday, 29 May)
• question about "xsltTransformation" property in DAML-S 0.9+ (Thursday, 8 May)

Kostas Stathis

• FINAL CFP: Socio-Cognitive Grids (Tuesday, 6 May)

Marcos&Marcos

• Turismo Rural - promoções fantásticas / promociones fantásticos (Tuesday, 13 May)

Mark Baker

• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Saturday, 31 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Friday, 30 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Friday, 30 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Wednesday, 28 May)
• POST and visibility (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Monday, 26 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Monday, 26 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Monday, 26 May)
• REST PO example (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Magic (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Explaining visibility, take 54 (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: Explaining visibility, take 54 (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: Explaining visibility, take 54 (Sunday, 11 May)
• Re: Explaining visibility, take 54 (Friday, 9 May)
• Explaining visibility, take 54 (Friday, 9 May)

Mark Burstein

• Re: DAML-S: Conditional E/Os (Monday, 26 May)
• Re: DAML-S: nondeterministic services (Sunday, 4 May)

Marta Sabou

• Re: Correspondance of Profile and Process IOPE's (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Correspondance of Profile and Process IOPE's (Thursday, 15 May)

Massimo Paolucci

• [ann} WSDL2DAML-S Converter (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: DAML-S ProcessModel (Friday, 16 May)
• Re: question about "xsltTransformation" property in DAML-S 0.9+ (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: question about "xsltTransformation" property in DAML-S 0.9+ (Thursday, 8 May)

Michael Kifer

• Re: Fwd: Re: DAML-S ProcessModel (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Fwd: Re: DAML-S ProcessModel (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: DAML-S ProcessModel (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: Questions about subsumption relationships for matchmaking (Monday, 12 May)

Mike Champion

• Re: Explaining visibility, take 54 (Friday, 9 May)

Miles Sabin

• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Monday, 26 May)

mithun sheshagiri

• DAML-S: Conditional E/Os (Monday, 26 May)
• Re: DAML-S: nondeterministic services (Sunday, 4 May)
• DAML-S: nondeterministic services (Sunday, 4 May)

Monika Solanki

• Research Associate Post and a PhD studentship (Thursday, 15 May)
• Congo Example: Process daml and DataFlow daml (Saturday, 10 May)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Tuesday, 27 May)

Saied Tazari

• Re: [DAML-S] About grounding of services (Friday, 23 May)
• Re: process:sameValues redefined (Friday, 23 May)
• [DAML-S] About grounding of services (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: examples on WS (Tuesday, 20 May)
• process:sameValues redefined (Monday, 19 May)

Sara Comai

• Reminder: CFP: VLDB-TES'03 - 4th VLDB Workshop on Technologies for E-services (Monday, 26 May)

Sheila McIlraith

• Re: Process parameter description (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Where is DAML-S Editor? (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: DAML-S: Conditional E/Os (Monday, 26 May)
• Re: DAML-S ProcessModel (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: DAML-S ProcessModel (Monday, 19 May)

Stanislaw Ambroszkiewicz

• Re: Meaning (Friday, 23 May)
• Re: Meaning (Thursday, 22 May)
• Re: DAML-S ProcessModel (Thursday, 22 May)
• Re: DAML-S ProcessModel (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: DAML-S ProcessModel (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: DAML-S ProcessModel (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: DAML-S ProcessModel (Monday, 19 May)

Sudhir Agarwal

• Re: Fwd: Re: DAML-S ProcessModel (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: Fwd: Re: DAML-S ProcessModel (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Fwd: Re: DAML-S ProcessModel (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: DAML-S ProcessModel (Saturday, 17 May)
• DAML-S ProcessModel (Friday, 16 May)

Terry R. Payne

• RE: Proposed Changes to Profile.daml (0.9) (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Proposed Changes to Profile.daml (0.9) (Thursday, 15 May)
• DAML-S 0.9 Beta Release and New DAML-S Web Site (Wednesday, 7 May)

titi@cs-gw.utcluj.ro

• Re: question: named vs. anonymous classes in creation of conditional outputs and effects (Wednesday, 21 May)
• question: named vs. anonymous classes in creation of conditional outputs and effects (Tuesday, 20 May)

Tomoko Nishio

• [www-ws] <none> (Thursday, 1 May)
• [www-ws] <none> (Thursday, 1 May)

Walden Mathews

• Prediction is hard; Analysis harder (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services (Tuesday, 27 May)

강민구

• DAML-S Editor (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Where is DAML-S editor? (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Where is DAML-S Editor? (Tuesday, 27 May)
• I want join you... (Wednesday, 14 May)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 May 2003 15:52:36 UTC