- From: <Joachim.Peer@unisg.ch>
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 13:15:15 +0200
- To: www-ws@w3.org
dear DAML-S researchers, i would like to compile a brief comparison of the various existing approaches for mapping between DAML+OIL(OWL) and XML, and of course i am very interested to learn about the mapping concept envisioned for DAML-S 0.9 Does there exist an example/explanation of the "xsltTransformation" property, or is this work in progress? To discuss the various problems (and solutions) of the XSLT based mapping, I have written a (very simple) example, a mapping of a DAML+OIL "purchase order" to some XML represention. The example is available online: http://sws.mcm.unisg.ch/mapping/po.daml (the DAML+OIL ontology; the XML schema is http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/#po.xsd) http://sws.mcm.unisg.ch/mapping/po.xml (an instance of the XML schema) http://sws.mcm.unisg.ch/mapping/po_instance.rdf (an instance of the DAML+OIL ontology) http://sws.mcm.unisg.ch/mapping/PO-daml2xml.xsl (the XSL stylesheet which maps from ONE RDF/XML representation to XML) Of course i do not know if this is compatible with the current ideas regarding the "xsltTransformation" property ;-) However, the example illustrates some open issues/some of the questions i currently have: * a DAML+OIL concept can have multiple RDF/XML representations => Q: Do you plan to impose some guidelines which restrict the use of certain RFD abbrev. syntaxes, or do you think it's the responsibility of the softare agents, to figure out how _exactly_ the mapping should be carried out , e.g. to figure out which RDF/XML style is used, etc. * XSLT Transformations are not bi-directional => Q: will the stylesheets for inputProperties look different than those for outputProperties? thanks in advance, joachim Joachim Peer Research Assistant MCM Institute, University of St. Gallen Blumenbergplatz 9, 9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland Phone: ++41 (0) 71 224 3441, Fax: ++41 (0) 71 224 2771
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2003 07:12:51 UTC