- From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 10:42:15 -0400
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, www-ws@w3.org
On Fri, 9 May 2003 08:25:29 -0400, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org> wrote: > A. A generic SOAP/XML intermediary > B. An intermediary hardcoded to the WSDL document above > C. An intermediary hardcoded to some other WSDL document > > I suggest that B has vastly superior visibility to A or C. Uhh, OK, but what's the point? An intermediary by definition is a "3rd party" component that doesn't understand the application-specific data format (such as that WSDL describes), so "B" and "C" are oxymorons. -- Mike Champion
Received on Friday, 9 May 2003 10:45:26 UTC