- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 07:47:43 -0400
- To: Anne Thomas Manes <anne@manes.net>
- Cc: www-ws@w3.org
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 12:11:22PM -0400, Anne Thomas Manes wrote: > Mark, > > Although it's conceivable that people might want to build an intermediary > dedicated to processing a specific type of SOAP message, it's not the normal > practice. I agree, but IMO that's beside the point. The purpose of my initial message in this thread was to highlight that *IF* an intermediary were programmed to understand a specific type of SOAP interface, necessarily), *THEN* it would have vastly superior visibility to one that didn't. For example, a stock quote analysis intermediary would have better visibility when placed between a stock quote client and a stock quote server, than it would between a cake baking client and a cake baking server. Do you not agree? MB -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis Actively seeking contract work or employment
Received on Sunday, 11 May 2003 07:45:33 UTC