www-ws-desc@w3.org from January 2004 by date

Sunday, 1 February 2004

• Re: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed Sanjiva Weerawarana

Saturday, 31 January 2004

• Re: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed Mark Baker
• Re: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed Roberto Chinnici
• RE: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed David Orchard
• Re: Second level xs:import Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed Sanjiva Weerawarana

Friday, 30 January 2004

• A scenario investigating questions of conformance and scoping Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Second level xs:import Martin Gudgin
• RE: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed Martin Gudgin
• Re: Another try at HTTP binding Mark Baker

Thursday, 29 January 2004

• Re: The semantics of mandatory properties and features Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Presentation for Compositors Umit Yalcinalp

Wednesday, 28 January 2004

• RE: Optional Extensions Yaron Goland
• RE: WSDL Specification readability: formulaic text Yaron Goland
• Re: Optional Extensions Mark Baker
• RE: Optional Extensions Liu, Kevin
• Re: Optional Extensions Prasad Yendluri
• Re: Optional Extensions Glen Daniels
• Part 1, section 2.4.1, {message} Bijan Parsia
• Re: Optional Extensions Prasad Yendluri
• Re: Optional Extensions Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Optional Extensions Jeff Mischkinsky
• Re: Optional Extensions Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Optional Extensions Liu, Kevin
• RE: WSD charter goal: Simplicity David Orchard
• Re: Action item 2003-11-03 OperationName feature Mark Baker
• Re: WSD charter goal: Simplicity Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Action item 2003-11-03 OperationName feature Mark Baker

Tuesday, 27 January 2004

• RE: WSD charter goal: Simplicity Tom Jordahl
• RE: Optional Extensions Glen Daniels
• RE: Optional Extensions Glen Daniels
• Re: Optional Extensions Prasad Yendluri
• Re: in-optional-out? Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Optional Extensions Yaron Goland
• RE: in-optional-out? Yaron Goland
• Re: WSDL Specification readability: formulaic text Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Simplified WSDL Syntax Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Why aren't two input/output elements allowed to share the same messageReference value? Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Optional Extensions Prasad Yendluri
• Re: in-optional-out? Sanjiva Weerawarana
• WSDL Specification readability: formulaic text David Orchard

Monday, 26 January 2004

• RE: Simplified WSDL Syntax Yaron Goland
• RE: Why aren't two input/output elements allowed to share the same messageReference value? Yaron Goland
• RE: Second level xs:import Yaron Goland
• RE: Optional Extensions David Orchard
• Re: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed Prasad Yendluri
• Re: Optional Extensions Prasad Yendluri
• Proposal for adding Compositors to WSDL 2.0 Umit Yalcinalp
• RE: Optional Extensions Jeff Mischkinsky
• RE: Optional Extensions Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: Simplified WSDL Syntax Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: Optional Extensions Mark Baker
• RE: Optional Extensions David Orchard
• Re: Optional Extensions Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed Philippe Le Hegaret
• RE: Suggest TAG/WSD WG liaison meeting at tech plenary David Orchard
• Re: in-optional-out? Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Why aren't two input/output elements allowed to share the same messageReference value? Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Second level xs:import Amelia A Lewis
• in-optional-out? David Orchard
• re-use faults by ref David Orchard
• Why aren't two input/output elements allowed to share the same messageReference value? David Orchard
• Message attribute optional David Orchard
• Second level xs:import David Orchard
• Optional Extensions David Orchard
• Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed David Orchard
• RE: optional messageReference attribute on interface definition elements Tom Jordahl

Sunday, 25 January 2004

• Your Ship Has Come In! This Time You Are Not At The Airport! Will Smith

Monday, 26 January 2004

• Re: Header/Body Style Proposal Amelia A Lewis

Saturday, 24 January 2004

• RE: WSDL Import/Include Locations Yaron Goland
• RE: optional messageReference attribute on interface definition elements Yaron Goland

Friday, 23 January 2004

• RE: Header/Body Style Proposal Yaron Goland
• RE: Simplified WSDL Syntax Yaron Goland
• Re: WSDL Import/Include Locations Amelia A Lewis
• Re: optional messageReference attribute on interface definition elements Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Header/Body Style Proposal Amelia A Lewis
• WSD charter goal: Simplicity David Orchard
• WSDL 1.1 XML Schemas Legal Issue Jeffrey Stephenson

Thursday, 22 January 2004

• FW: Issue 32: SOAP 1.1 support Liu, Kevin
• RE: Header/Body Style Proposal Yaron Goland
• Re: Requiring all operations to be bound Umit Yalcinalp
• WSDL Import/Include Locations Yaron Goland
• Confusion between binding and element names Yaron Goland
• optional messageReference attribute on interface definition elements Yaron Goland
• The semantics of mandatory properties and features Yaron Goland
• Requiring all operations to be bound Yaron Goland
• messageReference semantics on binding Yaron Goland
• Broken resolution of NCNAME or QNAME Yaron Goland
• A & B in MEPs Yaron Goland
• RE: Simplified WSDL Syntax Liu, Kevin
• Re: Header/Body Style Proposal Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Header/Body Style Proposal Yaron Goland

Friday, 23 January 2004

• Re: Header/Body Style Proposal Sanjiva Weerawarana

Thursday, 22 January 2004

• [ rev 1] Agenda: 28-30 Jan 2004 WS Description WG FTF Jonathan Marsh

Friday, 23 January 2004

• Re: Simplified WSDL Syntax Sanjiva Weerawarana

Thursday, 22 January 2004

• Re: Simplified WSDL Syntax Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Header/Body Style Proposal Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Action item 2003-11-03 OperationName feature Umit Yalcinalp
• RE: Simplified WSDL Syntax Tom Jordahl
• RE: Header/Body Style Proposal David Orchard

Friday, 23 January 2004

• Re: Header/Body Style Proposal Sanjiva Weerawarana

Thursday, 22 January 2004

• Charter comments: SOAP 1.1 David Orchard
• Compatible evolution of schemas David Orchard
• Re: Another try at HTTP binding Jean-Jacques Moreau
• RE: Issue 32: SOAP 1.1 support Prasad Yendluri
• Re: Simplified WSDL Syntax Prasad Yendluri
• Re: Action item 2003-11-03 OperationName feature Mark Baker
• Re: Another try at HTTP binding Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: Simplified WSDL Syntax Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Header/Body Style Proposal Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Action item 2003-11-03 OperationName feature paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Another try at HTTP binding paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Action item 2003-11-03 OperationName feature Mark Baker
• Re: Another try at HTTP binding Roberto Chinnici
• Attributes Steve Tuecke

Wednesday, 21 January 2004

• RE: Header/Body Style Proposal Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Another try at HTTP binding Philippe Le Hegaret
• RE: Header/Body Style Proposal David Orchard
• Action item 2003-11-03 OperationName feature Umit Yalcinalp
• Agenda, 22 January 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Header/Body Style Proposal Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Issue 32: SOAP 1.1 support Philippe Le Hegaret
• RE: Versioning and Web Service Description David Orchard
• RE: Issue 32: SOAP 1.1 support David Orchard
• Versioning and Web Service Description paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Issue 32: SOAP 1.1 support paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Issue 32: SOAP 1.1 support Jeff Mischkinsky
• RE: Issue 32: SOAP 1.1 support David Orchard
• Re: Issue 32: SOAP 1.1 support Jeff Mischkinsky
• Simplified WSDL Syntax Yaron Goland
• Versioning Use Cases David Orchard
• Header/Body Style Proposal Yaron Goland
• Issue 32: SOAP 1.1 support David Orchard

Tuesday, 20 January 2004

• Agenda: 28-30 Jan 2004 WS Description WG FTF Jonathan Marsh
• Features and Properties Martin Chapman
• Please Join My Superb Yahoo Forums! Will Smith
• RE: Proposal: abstract faults (amendment) paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Proposal: abstract faults (amended) paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Proposal: abstract faults (amended) Roberto Chinnici

Monday, 19 January 2004

• RE: Incorporating Service References in Part1 Jonathan Marsh
• Proposal: abstract faults (amended) paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Another try at HTTP binding Mark Baker
• Re: Another try at HTTP binding Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Another try at HTTP binding Mark Baker
• Re: Another try at HTTP binding Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Followup: multiple services sharing a name Jacek Kopecky
• Alternate approach to indicating operation styles Jacek Kopecky

Friday, 16 January 2004

• Re: bugs in WSDL1.1 specs but no reference to issues list? Jean-Jacques Moreau

Thursday, 15 January 2004

• bugs in WSDL1.1 specs but no reference to issues list? Joachim.Peer@unisg.ch
• Minutes, 15 January 2004 Web Services Description Working Group teleconference Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Followup: multiple services sharing a name Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Extending the functionality of an existing Web Service David Booth
• Re: Followup: multiple services sharing a name David Booth
• Deadline Reminder: 2004 IEEE International Conference on Web Serv ices (ICWS 2004) Patrick.Hung@csiro.au
• Re: Incorporating Service References in Part1 Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Incorporating Service References in Part1 Umit Yalcinalp

Wednesday, 14 January 2004

• Followup: multiple services sharing a name Amelia A Lewis
• Agenda, 15 January 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh

Tuesday, 13 January 2004

• Re: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service Jacek Kopecky

Monday, 12 January 2004

• RE: encodingStyle Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service paul.downey@bt.com

Friday, 9 January 2004

• Re: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service David Booth
• RE: encodingStyle paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: encodingStyle Glen Daniels
• RE: encodingStyle paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: encodingStyle paul.downey@bt.com

Thursday, 8 January 2004

• RE: Extending the functionality of an existing Web Service David Orchard
• RE: Extending the functionality of an existing Web Service Tom Jordahl
• Draft minutes of 08-Jan-2004 telcon Roberto Chinnici
• RE: encodingStyle Glen Daniels
• RE: encodingStyle Martin Gudgin
• RE: encodingStyle paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: encodingStyle paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Another try at HTTP binding Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: [rev] Agenda, 8 January 2004 WS Desc telcon Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Another try at HTTP binding Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: Another try at HTTP binding Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Issue: properties and schema languages other than XSD Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Extending the functionality of an existing Web Service Jean-Jacques Moreau
• A swing at schema import text Glen Daniels
• Extending the functionality of an existing Web Service paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service David Booth
• Re: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service David Booth
• Re: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service David Booth
• WS-I review drafts of Basic Profile Attachements work now available Jeff Mischkinsky
• Likely regrets for Jan 8th telecon Bijan Parsia

Wednesday, 7 January 2004

• [rev] Agenda, 8 January 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh

Tuesday, 6 January 2004

• RE: Fuflillment of action item: language for circular includes Jeffrey Schlimmer
• Agenda, 8 January 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Issue: properties and schema languages other than XSD Jeffrey Schlimmer
• Issue: properties and schema languages other than XSD Roberto Chinnici

Monday, 5 January 2004

• Minutes of WS Description call 2003-12-18 Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service Amelia A Lewis

Sunday, 4 January 2004

• Re: encodingStyle Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service Jacek Kopecky

Saturday, 3 January 2004

• Fwd: New Mailing List - public-ws-media-types@w3.org David Booth

Last message date: Saturday, 31 January 2004 19:12:08 UTC