- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 15:29:28 -0500
- To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: Web Services Description <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 26 January 2004 15:32:37 UTC
On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 14:49, David Orchard wrote: > We'd like to see an Asynch HTTP binding for In-Out. This uses two HTTP > connections, one for each direction. We have found this "asynch" > request/response over HTTP to be a very common pattern in customer use and > would like an explicit HTTP binding. So, I explicitly excluded all out-something from the HTTP binding because I'm still not convinced on how the WSDL processor can be handled this without extra information. Addressing would be at least required and I don't know if we want to have addressing required in all WSDL processors. Unless we have addressing, we cannot describe asynch HTTP imho. Also, since the "out" or "asynch-out" message are really HTTP "in" message, I believe that the those message would need extra handling in the binding spec. Is this related to PAOS btw? Philippe
Received on Monday, 26 January 2004 15:32:37 UTC