Re: in-optional-out? from Amelia A Lewis on 2004-01-26 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from January 2004)

From: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 15:18:00 -0500
To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-id: <BCE0DC19-503C-11D8-9D84-0050E416A465@tibco.com>

If you want it, write it up and propose it to the group for inclusion.  
If you can convince enough folks, it'll likely go in.

out-optional-in is there because I made a nuisance of myself.

Amy!
On Jan 26, 2004, at 3:00 PM, David Orchard wrote:

>
> There is an out-optional-in but what about in-optional-out?
>
> Cheers,
> Dave
>

Received on Monday, 26 January 2004 15:17:12 UTC