Yes, I believe it was intent. It looks like we need to fix the spec. Jean-Jacques; Yaron Goland wrote: > Does the required attribute defined in sections 2.6.2.2 and 2.7.2.2 have the > same semantics as the wsdl:required attribute defined in section > 6.1.1/6.1.2? In other words, if a property or feature is marked with > required="true" and the WSDL engine doesn't recognize the marked property or > feature then must the WSDL engine fault? If so, shouldn't this be explicitly > pointed out in the spec? > > Thanks, > > Yaron >Received on Thursday, 29 January 2004 09:49:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:54:46 UTC