Re: The semantics of mandatory properties and features

Yes, I believe it was intent. It looks like we need to fix the spec.


Yaron Goland wrote:

> Does the required attribute defined in sections and have the
> same semantics as the wsdl:required attribute defined in section
> 6.1.1/6.1.2? In other words, if a property or feature is marked with
> required="true" and the WSDL engine doesn't recognize the marked property or
> feature then must the WSDL engine fault? If so, shouldn't this be explicitly
> pointed out in the spec?
> 	Thanks,
> 		Yaron

Received on Thursday, 29 January 2004 09:49:41 UTC