Re: The semantics of mandatory properties and features

Yes, I believe it was intent. It looks like we need to fix the spec.

Jean-Jacques;

Yaron Goland wrote:

> Does the required attribute defined in sections 2.6.2.2 and 2.7.2.2 have the
> same semantics as the wsdl:required attribute defined in section
> 6.1.1/6.1.2? In other words, if a property or feature is marked with
> required="true" and the WSDL engine doesn't recognize the marked property or
> feature then must the WSDL engine fault? If so, shouldn't this be explicitly
> pointed out in the spec?
> 
> 	Thanks,
> 
> 		Yaron
>