www-ws-desc@w3.org from January 2004 by author

Amelia A Lewis

• A scenario investigating questions of conformance and scoping (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Optional Extensions (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Optional Extensions (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: in-optional-out? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: WSDL Specification readability: formulaic text (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Simplified WSDL Syntax (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Why aren't two input/output elements allowed to share the same messageReference value? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: in-optional-out? (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Why aren't two input/output elements allowed to share the same messageReference value? (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Second level xs:import (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Header/Body Style Proposal (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: WSDL Import/Include Locations (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: optional messageReference attribute on interface definition elements (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Header/Body Style Proposal (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Header/Body Style Proposal (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Simplified WSDL Syntax (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Header/Body Style Proposal (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Simplified WSDL Syntax (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Header/Body Style Proposal (Thursday, 22 January)
• Minutes, 15 January 2004 Web Services Description Working Group teleconference (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Followup: multiple services sharing a name (Thursday, 15 January)
• Followup: multiple services sharing a name (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service (Monday, 12 January)
• Re: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: [rev] Agenda, 8 January 2004 WS Desc telcon (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service (Monday, 5 January)

Bijan Parsia

• Part 1, section 2.4.1, {message} (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Likely regrets for Jan 8th telecon (Thursday, 8 January)

David Booth

• RE: Extending the functionality of an existing Web Service (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Followup: multiple services sharing a name (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service (Thursday, 8 January)
• Fwd: New Mailing List - public-ws-media-types@w3.org (Saturday, 3 January)

David Orchard

• RE: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Saturday, 31 January)
• RE: WSD charter goal: Simplicity (Wednesday, 28 January)
• WSDL Specification readability: formulaic text (Tuesday, 27 January)
• RE: Optional Extensions (Monday, 26 January)
• RE: Optional Extensions (Monday, 26 January)
• RE: Suggest TAG/WSD WG liaison meeting at tech plenary (Monday, 26 January)
• in-optional-out? (Monday, 26 January)
• re-use faults by ref (Monday, 26 January)
• Why aren't two input/output elements allowed to share the same messageReference value? (Monday, 26 January)
• Message attribute optional (Monday, 26 January)
• Second level xs:import (Monday, 26 January)
• Optional Extensions (Monday, 26 January)
• Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Monday, 26 January)
• WSD charter goal: Simplicity (Friday, 23 January)
• RE: Header/Body Style Proposal (Thursday, 22 January)
• Charter comments: SOAP 1.1 (Thursday, 22 January)
• Compatible evolution of schemas (Thursday, 22 January)
• RE: Header/Body Style Proposal (Wednesday, 21 January)
• RE: Versioning and Web Service Description (Wednesday, 21 January)
• RE: Issue 32: SOAP 1.1 support (Wednesday, 21 January)
• RE: Issue 32: SOAP 1.1 support (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Versioning Use Cases (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Issue 32: SOAP 1.1 support (Wednesday, 21 January)
• RE: Extending the functionality of an existing Web Service (Thursday, 8 January)

Glen Daniels

• Re: Optional Extensions (Wednesday, 28 January)
• RE: Optional Extensions (Tuesday, 27 January)
• RE: Optional Extensions (Tuesday, 27 January)
• RE: encodingStyle (Friday, 9 January)
• RE: encodingStyle (Thursday, 8 January)
• A swing at schema import text (Thursday, 8 January)

Jacek Kopecky

• Re: Another try at HTTP binding (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: Another try at HTTP binding (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: Followup: multiple services sharing a name (Monday, 19 January)
• Alternate approach to indicating operation styles (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service (Tuesday, 13 January)
• RE: encodingStyle (Monday, 12 January)
• Re: encodingStyle (Sunday, 4 January)
• Re: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service (Sunday, 4 January)
• Re: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service (Sunday, 4 January)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

• Re: The semantics of mandatory properties and features (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Another try at HTTP binding (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: bugs in WSDL1.1 specs but no reference to issues list? (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Another try at HTTP binding (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: Another try at HTTP binding (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: Issue: properties and schema languages other than XSD (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: Extending the functionality of an existing Web Service (Thursday, 8 January)

Jeff Mischkinsky

• RE: Optional Extensions (Wednesday, 28 January)
• RE: Optional Extensions (Monday, 26 January)
• RE: Issue 32: SOAP 1.1 support (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: Issue 32: SOAP 1.1 support (Wednesday, 21 January)
• WS-I review drafts of Basic Profile Attachements work now available (Thursday, 8 January)

Jeffrey Schlimmer

• RE: Fuflillment of action item: language for circular includes (Tuesday, 6 January)
• RE: Issue: properties and schema languages other than XSD (Tuesday, 6 January)

Jeffrey Stephenson

• WSDL 1.1 XML Schemas Legal Issue (Friday, 23 January)

Joachim.Peer@unisg.ch

• bugs in WSDL1.1 specs but no reference to issues list? (Thursday, 15 January)

Jonathan Marsh

• [ rev 1] Agenda: 28-30 Jan 2004 WS Description WG FTF (Thursday, 22 January)
• RE: Header/Body Style Proposal (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Agenda, 22 January 2004 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 21 January)
• RE: Header/Body Style Proposal (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Agenda: 28-30 Jan 2004 WS Description WG FTF (Tuesday, 20 January)
• RE: Incorporating Service References in Part1 (Monday, 19 January)
• Agenda, 15 January 2004 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 14 January)
• [rev] Agenda, 8 January 2004 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 7 January)
• Agenda, 8 January 2004 WS Desc telcon (Tuesday, 6 January)
• Minutes of WS Description call 2003-12-18 (Monday, 5 January)

Liu, Kevin

• RE: Optional Extensions (Wednesday, 28 January)
• RE: Optional Extensions (Wednesday, 28 January)
• FW: Issue 32: SOAP 1.1 support (Thursday, 22 January)
• RE: Simplified WSDL Syntax (Thursday, 22 January)

Mark Baker

• Re: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: Another try at HTTP binding (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Optional Extensions (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Action item 2003-11-03 OperationName feature (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Action item 2003-11-03 OperationName feature (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Optional Extensions (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Action item 2003-11-03 OperationName feature (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Action item 2003-11-03 OperationName feature (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Another try at HTTP binding (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: Another try at HTTP binding (Monday, 19 January)

Martin Chapman

• Features and Properties (Tuesday, 20 January)

Martin Gudgin

• RE: Second level xs:import (Friday, 30 January)
• RE: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Friday, 30 January)
• RE: encodingStyle (Thursday, 8 January)

Patrick.Hung@csiro.au

• Deadline Reminder: 2004 IEEE International Conference on Web Serv ices (ICWS 2004) (Thursday, 15 January)

paul.downey@bt.com

• RE: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Saturday, 31 January)
• RE: Action item 2003-11-03 OperationName feature (Thursday, 22 January)
• RE: Another try at HTTP binding (Thursday, 22 January)
• Versioning and Web Service Description (Wednesday, 21 January)
• RE: Issue 32: SOAP 1.1 support (Wednesday, 21 January)
• RE: Proposal: abstract faults (amendment) (Tuesday, 20 January)
• RE: Proposal: abstract faults (amended) (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Proposal: abstract faults (amended) (Monday, 19 January)
• RE: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service (Monday, 12 January)
• RE: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service (Monday, 12 January)
• RE: encodingStyle (Friday, 9 January)
• RE: encodingStyle (Friday, 9 January)
• RE: encodingStyle (Friday, 9 January)
• RE: encodingStyle (Thursday, 8 January)
• RE: encodingStyle (Thursday, 8 January)
• Extending the functionality of an existing Web Service (Thursday, 8 January)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• RE: Optional Extensions (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Simplified WSDL Syntax (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Optional Extensions (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Another try at HTTP binding (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Another try at HTTP binding (Wednesday, 21 January)
• RE: Issue 32: SOAP 1.1 support (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: Another try at HTTP binding (Thursday, 8 January)

Prasad Yendluri

• Re: Optional Extensions (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Optional Extensions (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Optional Extensions (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Optional Extensions (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Optional Extensions (Monday, 26 January)
• RE: Issue 32: SOAP 1.1 support (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Simplified WSDL Syntax (Thursday, 22 January)

Roberto Chinnici

• Re: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: Another try at HTTP binding (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Proposal: abstract faults (amended) (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Draft minutes of 08-Jan-2004 telcon (Thursday, 8 January)
• Issue: properties and schema languages other than XSD (Tuesday, 6 January)

Sanjiva Weerawarana

• Re: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Sunday, 1 February)
• Re: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: Second level xs:import (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: WSD charter goal: Simplicity (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: in-optional-out? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Header/Body Style Proposal (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Simplified WSDL Syntax (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Header/Body Style Proposal (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Incorporating Service References in Part1 (Thursday, 15 January)

Steve Tuecke

• Attributes (Thursday, 22 January)

Tom Jordahl

• RE: WSD charter goal: Simplicity (Tuesday, 27 January)
• RE: optional messageReference attribute on interface definition elements (Monday, 26 January)
• RE: Simplified WSDL Syntax (Thursday, 22 January)
• RE: Extending the functionality of an existing Web Service (Thursday, 8 January)

Umit Yalcinalp

• Presentation for Compositors (Thursday, 29 January)
• Proposal for adding Compositors to WSDL 2.0 (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Requiring all operations to be bound (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Action item 2003-11-03 OperationName feature (Thursday, 22 January)
• Action item 2003-11-03 OperationName feature (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Incorporating Service References in Part1 (Thursday, 15 January)

Will Smith

• Your Ship Has Come In! This Time You Are Not At The Airport! (Sunday, 25 January)
• Please Join My Superb Yahoo Forums! (Tuesday, 20 January)

Yaron Goland

• RE: Optional Extensions (Wednesday, 28 January)
• RE: WSDL Specification readability: formulaic text (Wednesday, 28 January)
• RE: Optional Extensions (Tuesday, 27 January)
• RE: in-optional-out? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• RE: Simplified WSDL Syntax (Monday, 26 January)
• RE: Why aren't two input/output elements allowed to share the same messageReference value? (Monday, 26 January)
• RE: Second level xs:import (Monday, 26 January)
• RE: WSDL Import/Include Locations (Saturday, 24 January)
• RE: optional messageReference attribute on interface definition elements (Saturday, 24 January)
• RE: Header/Body Style Proposal (Friday, 23 January)
• RE: Simplified WSDL Syntax (Friday, 23 January)
• RE: Header/Body Style Proposal (Thursday, 22 January)
• WSDL Import/Include Locations (Thursday, 22 January)
• Confusion between binding and element names (Thursday, 22 January)
• optional messageReference attribute on interface definition elements (Thursday, 22 January)
• The semantics of mandatory properties and features (Thursday, 22 January)
• Requiring all operations to be bound (Thursday, 22 January)
• messageReference semantics on binding (Thursday, 22 January)
• Broken resolution of NCNAME or QNAME (Thursday, 22 January)
• A & B in MEPs (Thursday, 22 January)
• RE: Header/Body Style Proposal (Thursday, 22 January)
• Simplified WSDL Syntax (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Header/Body Style Proposal (Wednesday, 21 January)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 January 2004 19:12:08 UTC