- From: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 11:48:45 -0500
- To: ygoland@bea.com
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
I tend to agree, but this was a painfully argument, and the result was in favor of simplification. Sanjiva, perhaps you could speak to whether this is something that ought to be reopened? If we reopen it, can we reopen the discussion of single interface per service? Amy! On Jan 22, 2004, at 6:07 PM, Yaron Goland wrote: > > The spec identifies one particular case in which the messageReference > attribute is optional on interfaces. While I am all for simplification > I > think in this case the optionality of the messageReference attribute > is more > likely to lead to confusion about when to use it then to lead to any > real > time savings on the part of the WSDL writer. As such I would recommend > that > for both consistent and clarity we make it mandatory in all scenarios. > > Thanks, > > Yaron >
Received on Friday, 23 January 2004 11:48:35 UTC