- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 22:43:56 -0800
- To: "'Sanjiva Weerawarana'" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, "'Martin Gudgin'" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, "'Philippe Le Hegaret'" <plh@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Web Services Description'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
yup. I agree. The issue about the callback address is related but can be orthogonal to the binding. Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com] > Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 4:46 PM > To: Martin Gudgin; Philippe Le Hegaret; David Orchard > Cc: Web Services Description > Subject: Re: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed > > > "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> writes: > > PAOS is slightly different. It has two MEPs, the one I think you are > > thinking of works as follows: > > > > Given nodes A and B: > > > > 1. node A makes an HTTP GET to node B. > > 2. Node B sends a SOAP Request as the HTTP response. > > 3. Node A responds with a SOAP response in an HTTP POST to Node B. > > 4. Node B responds with some HTTP response ( typically a web page ) > > > > Gudge > > I understood what DaveO wanted as: > > 1. node A makes an HTTP POST to node B with a SOAP Request and > information on where to POST the HTTP response to > 2. node B responds with something like 201 OK > 3. later on, node B makes an HTTP POST to node A with a SOAP Response > 4. node A responds with something like 201 OK > > DaveO?? > > I like this a lot but unfortunately one needs WS-Addressing > or something > similar to send the "information on where to POST the HTTP > response to". > > Sanjiva. > >
Received on Saturday, 31 January 2004 01:43:54 UTC