- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 08:13:54 -0800
- To: "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>, "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: "Web Services Description" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
PAOS is slightly different. It has two MEPs, the one I think you are thinking of works as follows: Given nodes A and B: 1. node A makes an HTTP GET to node B. 2. Node B sends a SOAP Request as the HTTP response. 3. Node A responds with a SOAP response in an HTTP POST to Node B. 4. Node B responds with some HTTP response ( typically a web page ) Gudge > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Philippe Le Hegaret > Sent: 26 January 2004 15:29 > To: David Orchard > Cc: Web Services Description > Subject: Re: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed > > On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 14:49, David Orchard wrote: > > We'd like to see an Asynch HTTP binding for In-Out. This > uses two HTTP > > connections, one for each direction. We have found this "asynch" > > request/response over HTTP to be a very common pattern in > customer use > > and would like an explicit HTTP binding. > > So, I explicitly excluded all out-something from the HTTP > binding because I'm still not convinced on how the WSDL > processor can be handled this without extra information. > Addressing would be at least required and I don't know if we > want to have addressing required in all WSDL processors. > Unless we have addressing, we cannot describe asynch HTTP > imho. Also, since the "out" or "asynch-out" message are > really HTTP "in" > message, I believe that the those message would need extra > handling in the binding spec. > > Is this related to PAOS btw? > > Philippe > >
Received on Friday, 30 January 2004 11:15:25 UTC