www-validator@w3.org from April 2004 by date

Friday, 30 April 2004

• A single (minor) issue with the new [Beta #3] d8uv (Cody Woodard)
• Re: Problem with <a name="foo" /> vs. <a name="foo"></a> David Dorward
• Problem with <a name="foo" /> vs. <a name="foo"></a> Ryan Holliday
• Re: URI vs URL and long list of pedantic gramatical quibbles with the static pages Philip TAYLOR
• Re: URI vs URL and long list of pedantic gramatical quibbles with the static pages Andrew Robinson
• Re: URI vs URL David Dorward
• Re: URI vs URL and long list of pedantic gramatical quibbles with the static pages Philip TAYLOR
• Validator is not a person (?) Samuel Rinnetmäki
• Jump To: box in beta w3validator@puoli.net
• Re: Remaining issue with 0.6.5beta3 (Was: [ANN] Beta test for the Markup Validator) olivier Thereaux
• Re: Remaining issue with 0.6.5beta3 (Was: [ANN] Beta test for the Markup Validator) David Dorward
• Remaining issue with 0.6.5beta3 (Was: [ANN] Beta test for the Markup Validator) olivier Thereaux
• [ANN] Beta test for the Markup Validator - 0.6.5beta3 olivier Thereaux
• Re: URI vs URL and long list of pedantic gramatical quibbles with the static pages Frank Ellermann
• Re: URI vs URL and long list of pedantic gramatical quibbles with the static pages olivier Thereaux

Thursday, 29 April 2004

• CANTORS: A FAITH IN SONG info@thecantors.com
• Re: URI vs URL and long list of pedantic gramatical quibbles with the static pages Ville Skyttä

Wednesday, 28 April 2004

• URI vs URL and long list of pedantic gramatical quibbles with the static pages Andrew Robinson
• Re: Runtime errors and excluding URIs by regex Ville Skyttä
• Re: checklink: Does anyone have the required packages compiled for Win32 Ville Skyttä
• Re: checklink: Does anyone have the required packages compiled for Win32 Michael Volikas
• Re: checklink: Does anyone have the required packages compiled for Win32 Ville Skyttä
• checklink: Does anyone have the required packages compiled for Win32 Michael Volikas

Tuesday, 27 April 2004

• Re: Prerequisites list incomplete Olivier Thereaux
• Re: Prerequisites list incomplete Ville Skyttä
• Re: Prerequisites list incomplete Olivier Thereaux
• Prerequisites list incomplete David Pisoni
• Re: The error message for uploading a non html document Ville Skyttä
• Re: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Frank Ellermann
• Re: The error message for uploading a non html document olivier Thereaux
• Re: The error message for uploading a non html document David Dorward
• The error message for uploading a non html document Dru Sellers

Monday, 26 April 2004

• Re: Nested link bug? Ian Hickson
• Nested link bug? Kai Hendry
• Re: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Jukka K. Korpela

Sunday, 25 April 2004

• Bug in HTML/XHTML Validator catchall@mclamb.us

Monday, 26 April 2004

• Re: http://validator.w3.org/check/referer David Dorward
• Re: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Kynn Bartlett
• Runtime errors and excluding URIs by regex James Gallagher
• Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Andrew Robinson
• http://validator.w3.org/check/referer Włodzimierz Kubera
• Re: browser can see page but validator gets an error Ville Skyttä
• Re: validator and my homepage David Dorward
• validator and my homepage Paolo M. Grossholz
• Re: browser can see page but validator gets an error David Dorward
• Re: browser can see page but validator gets an error Claus Rosenberger
• Re: browser can see page but validator gets an error David Dorward
• browser can see page but validator gets an error Claus Rosenberger
• Re: MarkUp Validator's new clothes olivier Thereaux

Sunday, 25 April 2004

• Re: checklink: option to ignore certain links or groups of links Ville Skyttä

Saturday, 24 April 2004

• checklink: option to ignore certain links or groups of links James Gallagher

Sunday, 25 April 2004

• Application/Octet stream not supported Wesley Philpot
• Re: Validation & errors Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Validation & errors Nick Kew
• Re: This isnt valid XHTML 1.0!!! Terje Bless

Saturday, 24 April 2004

• Re: Validation & errors Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: This isnt valid XHTML 1.0!!! Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Validation & errors Nick Kew
• Re: This isnt valid XHTML 1.0!!! David Dorward
• Re: This isnt valid XHTML 1.0!!! Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: This isnt valid XHTML 1.0!!! Ville Skyttä
• This isnt valid XHTML 1.0!!! Chris Roche
• Re: [markup validator] source quoting i18n bug? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Tips for deprecated tags and attributes Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Running the validator locally: taint mode problems Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Validation & errors Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Tips for deprecated tags and attributes Ian Hickson
• Re: Tips for deprecated tags and attributes David Dorward
• Re: Tips for deprecated tags and attributes Frank Ellermann

Friday, 23 April 2004

• Re: Validation & errors Pete Prodoehl

Thursday, 22 April 2004

• Validation & errors Richard Cerrato

Friday, 23 April 2004

• Re: WWW Validator: Bad Hostname for shlomif.il.eu.org Shlomi Fish
• Re: MarkUp Validator's new clothes Terje Bless
• Re: (Entire) Site validation olivier Thereaux

Thursday, 22 April 2004

• Re: (Entire) Site validation Pete Prodoehl
• Re: [markup validator] source quoting i18n bug? Martin Duerst
• [markup validator] source quoting i18n bug? olivier Thereaux
• Re: Tips for deprecated tags and attributes Nick Kew
• Running the validator locally: taint mode problems Tim Jackson
• Re: Validator reporting just "Not valid" Terje Bless
• Re: No closing </head> tag and still validated? Liam Quinn
• Validator reporting just "Not valid" Jukka K. Korpela
• No closing </head> tag and still validated? Ruben van Loen

Wednesday, 21 April 2004

• Re: MarkUp Validator's new clothes Terje Bless
• Re: Tips for deprecated tags and attributes Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: MarkUp Validator's new clothes Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: MarkUp Validator's new clothes Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Tips for deprecated tags and attributes Andrew Robinson

Tuesday, 20 April 2004

• Re: (Entire) Site validation Frank Ellermann
• Re: Tips for deprecated tags and attributes Frank Ellermann
• RE: (Entire) Site validation Martin Salo
• Re: (Entire) Site validation Liam Quinn
• Re: Site validation olivier Thereaux
• Re: (Entire) Site validation David Dorward
• Re: Site validation Beton, Richard
• Site validation Martin Salo
• Re: Tips for deprecated tags and attributes Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Tips for deprecated tags and attributes Frank Ellermann
• Re: MarkUp Validator's new clothes olivier Thereaux

Monday, 19 April 2004

• Re: WWW Validator: Bad Hostname for shlomif.il.eu.org Ville Skyttä
• Re: WWW Validator: Bad Hostname for shlomif.il.eu.org Shlomi Fish
• Accesskeys and Keystrokes Combination on your web site John Britsios

Friday, 16 April 2004

• Thank you! Jim Delaplante

Sunday, 18 April 2004

• Re: Tips for deprecated tags and attributes Terje Bless
• Re: Tips for deprecated tags and attributes Frank Ellermann
• Re: MarkUp Validator's new clothes Frank Ellermann
• Tips for deprecated tags and attributes Jere Purmonen
• Re: WWW Validator: Bad Hostname for shlomif.il.eu.org Jon Ribbens
• Re: WWW Validator: Bad Hostname for shlomif.il.eu.org Ville Skyttä
• Re: Stylesheet for beta validator olivier Thereaux

Saturday, 17 April 2004

• Re: http://validator.w3.org/check Susan Lesch
• Re: the validator page isn't valid ;) Susan Lesch
• Re: WWW Validator: Bad Hostname for shlomif.il.eu.org Shlomi Fish
• Minor suggestion E. Steve Fabian
• SoftHouse Romania Presentation Alexandra Popescu
• Re: Bug Report + Patch: Config::General is required, but is not listed in the prerequisites. Ville Skyttä
• Bug Report + Patch: Config::General is required, but is not listed in the prerequisites. David Dorward
• Stylesheet for beta validator David Dorward

Friday, 16 April 2004

• Re: MarkUp Validator's new clothes Terje Bless
• Re: MarkUp Validator's new clothes Nick Kew
• Re: MarkUp Validator's new clothes Terje Bless
• Re: MarkUp Validator's new clothes Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: MarkUp Validator's new clothes Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: MarkUp Validator's new clothes Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [Fwd: the validator page isn't valid ;)] David Dorward
• [Fwd: the validator page isn't valid ;)] Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: MarkUp Validator's new clothes Terje Bless
• Re: MarkUp Validator's new clothes olivier Thereaux
• MarkUp Validator's new clothes Bjoern Hoehrmann

Thursday, 15 April 2004

• [ANN] Beta test for the Markup Validator - 0.6.5beta2 olivier Thereaux
• Re: Supporting the OL tag in XHTML Strict 1.0 Beton, Richard
• Supporting the OL tag in XHTML Strict 1.0 Samuel A. Falvo II

Wednesday, 18 February 1970

• LOS ANGELES CENTER FOR DIGITAL ART: CALL FOR ARTISTS LA Center For Digital Art

Tuesday, 13 April 2004

• Re: Validating pages that include Flash Nick Kew

Monday, 12 April 2004

• Re: Validating pages that include Flash Andrew Robinson
• Re: Validating pages that include Flash Ian Hickson
• Validating pages that include Flash Andrew Robinson

Thursday, 8 April 2004

• Seeking Help To Build IE Plugins amit mangla

Sunday, 11 April 2004

• Re: [ANN] W3C Link Checker - version 3.9.2 - first standalone release Ville Skyttä
• Re: [ANN] W3C Link Checker - version 3.9.2 - first standalone release Matthew Wilson

Saturday, 10 April 2004

• Re: Doc with no space in DTD considered valid Jamie Norrish

Friday, 9 April 2004

• Re: XHTML Markup Validation problem Liam Quinn
• Re: XHTML Markup Validation problem David Dorward
• XHTML Markup Validation problem Vito DeCarlo
• Vaman Partner program Dhiren Raval
• Re: Char set encoding Frank Ellermann

Thursday, 8 April 2004

• Re: checklink: links to HTML validator and CSS validator Ville Skyttä
• checklink: links to HTML validator and CSS validator Rafael Gieschke

Wednesday, 7 April 2004

• Char set encoding Veit Kannegieser
• WWW Validator: Bad Hostname for shlomif.il.eu.org Shlomi Fish
• Re: Invalid Validator Page Pete Prodoehl
• Radio Show Info@mojomusicstudio.com
• Re: Invalid Validator Page David Dorward
• Invalid Validator Page Stefan Ram

Tuesday, 6 April 2004

• checklink: Linda Povolo
• Re: Doc with no space in DTD considered valid Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Doc with no space in DTD considered valid Jamie Norrish
• Re: Doc with no space in DTD considered valid Jukka K. Korpela
• Doc with no space in DTD considered valid Jamie Norrish
• RE: Hmm, your document is not valid. But darnit, I aint going to tell you why <g> Barry Dorrans

Monday, 5 April 2004

• validator / checklink : probable (short) downtime olivier Thereaux
• Re: Hmm, your document is not valid. But darnit, I aint going to tell you why <g> olivier Thereaux
• Hmm, your document is not valid. But darnit, I aint going to tell you why <g> Barry Dorrans
• validator 0_6_0 type.cfg error Tu Trinh
• Re: The IFRAME tag David Dorward

Saturday, 3 April 2004

• The IFRAME tag Beech Horn

Monday, 5 April 2004

• Re: checklink: error codes Ville Skyttä
• Re: checklink: htmlhelp is forbidden Ville Skyttä
• Re: A small patch.. hehe.. David Dorward
• Re: A small patch.. hehe.. David Dorward
• A small patch.. hehe.. Mads / Shadeless Productions
• Re: checklink: error codes Nick Kew
• Re: checklink: htmlhelp is forbidden Terje Bless
• Re: checklink: htmlhelp is forbidden David Dorward
• Re: checklink: htmlhelp is forbidden Olivier Thereaux
• Re: checklink: htmlhelp is forbidden MichaelJennings
• When the linker is forbidden Tex Texin
• checklink: error codes Tex Texin

Sunday, 4 April 2004

• Re: checklink: htmlhelp is forbidden Nick Kew
• Newsletter Anmeldung / Newsletter Registration www.BIOFITSHOP.de www.TOPFITSHOP.de
• Re: Link checker: 404 error for http://www.debian.org/support Ville Skyttä
• Re: checklink: htmlhelp is forbidden Liam Quinn
• The title element of the result page Jukka K. Korpela
• XHTML conformance in one of your pages... Arnaud Joubay
• Re: bgcolor in Netscape David Dorward
• bgcolor in Netscape Janne Wedenborg
• Re: checklink: htmlhelp is forbidden David Dorward
• checklink: htmlhelp is forbidden MichaelJennings

Saturday, 3 April 2004

• Re: Unkown Mime type Tu Trinh
• Re: Unkown Mime type Olivier Thereaux
• Re: checklink: patch to add "--omit" option, to ignore certain URLs Ville Skyttä

Friday, 2 April 2004

• Unkown Mime type Tu Trinh
• Re: [ANN] W3C Link Checker - version 3.9.2 - first standalone release Pete Prodoehl
• [ANN] W3C Link Checker - version 3.9.2 - first standalone release olivier Thereaux

Thursday, 1 April 2004

• FAQ (Was: Page Validates, but problems with validator) olivier Thereaux
• Re: Page Validates, but problems with validator Pete Prodoehl
• Re: Page Validates, but problems with validator Pete Prodoehl
• Re: Page Validates, but problems with validator David Dorward
• Re: Page Validates, but problems with validator Pete Prodoehl
• Re: Installing CVS W3C validator: bug? Pete Prodoehl
• Re: Page Validates, but problems with validator David Dorward
• Page Validates, but problems with validator W.G. Hayes
• Re: Unable to validate an XHTML1.1 document with an empty body Nick Kew
• Unable to validate an XHTML1.1 document with an empty body Dave Laurenson
• Re: Admittedly obscure HTML doc't fools validator Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Installing CVS W3C validator: bug? Ville Skyttä

Last message date: Friday, 30 April 2004 18:50:13 UTC