- From: MichaelJennings <mikejenn@fiam.net>
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 04:04:23 -0400
- To: <www-validator@w3.org>
>>>> http://www.htmlhelp.com/ What to do: The link is forbidden! >>>> This needs fixing. Usual suspects: a missing index.html or >>>> Overview.html, or a missing ACL. >>> >>> I don't know why htmlhelp.com blocks the link checker, but I >>> wouldn't be surprised if it was something to do with the way it >>> (the link checker) ignores the robots exclusion standard. >> >> Yes, that's why. I banned W3C-checklink after it overloaded our >> server, preventing legitimate users from accessing it. >> W3C-checklink had been spidering resources that were disallowed >> in robots.txt. > > A while ago I had email from Liam drawing my attention to the > fact that I'd introduced a similar bug into htmlhelp's own link > checker. I've since fixed that, and round tuits permitting, I'll > take a look at the same issue in checklink. > > It can be very easy to overlook bugs when you don't have someone > complaining about them at a convenient time. W3C-checklink said to me, "You are no good - better fix it." David Dorward said to me, "You are wrong - w3c-checklink is right." Why should people complain when they're bound to be called fools? --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses at mail.fiam.net]
Received on Monday, 5 April 2004 04:05:24 UTC