- From: Jamie Norrish <jamie@artefact.org.nz>
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 19:39:41 +1200
- To: www-validator@w3.org
Jukka K. Korpela writes: > So the document type definition seems to be implied, and errors in > it, or in the way it is declared, might be interpreted as something > that need not be reported. Perhaps so, but surely the validator should not say that the document is valid, even if it (acceptably) does not report the error? How can a document be determined to be valid if it cannot be checked against a DTD? With the separator between the two identifiers, the document is reported as being valid HTML 4.01 strict. Without the separator, the document is simply valid - what does that mean? Jamie
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2004 03:40:14 UTC