Re: This isnt valid XHTML 1.0!!!

On Sat, 24 Apr 2004, David Dorward wrote:

> I'll just reference my answer of 8 days ago:
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2004Apr/0081.html>

I wonder whether it would be more useful to actually fix errors than
keep telling over and over again that they have been fixed in a beta
version. It's hard to convince normal authors to fix their invalid
markup when the validator's pages remain invalid, despite repeated
reports.

-- 
Jukka "Yucca" Korpela, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/

Received on Saturday, 24 April 2004 18:42:23 UTC