- From: Andrew Robinson <andrew@bml.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:59:48 +0100
- To: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi>, www-validator@w3.org
Ville Skyttä wrote: > > > Possible bug report - "URL" is underlined, my cursor has a question mark > > attached to it when I mouse over it but nothing happens when I click it > > (Mozilla/WamCom 1.3.1 for Mac OS9). > > This, and the "double underlining"s are <abbr title"foo"> elements, and > the "foo" usually renders as a tooltip in browsers when one hovers the > mouse some time over it. With the browsers I've tried, these <abbr>'s > render so that it is pretty clear (well, to me, that is) that they're > not clickable links. See attachment, that's from Mozilla Firefox 0.8 on > Linux. Could you post a screenshot how your browser renders them? Sorry about taing a while to post these screenshots, been a bit busy at work... http://www.abe11.dial.pipex.com/W3Ctestarea/mozwamcom1.3mac.gif which it looks like 2 links, one to "Writing html in a" and one to "Element" http://www.abe11.dial.pipex.com/W3Ctestarea/mozwamcom1.3macmouseover.gif is what happens when I mouseover the double underlined section. I'm reasonably sure that mouseover tooltips are possible with this browser, but I can't find any examples to compare code for at the moment. Since you might not know about WamCom (I did't until a few weeks back), Mozilla dropped support for Mac OS 9 at about version 1.2, going OSX only. WamCom is a port of mozilla 1.3.1 which includes many useful fixes/features not found on the final official Mozilla release, which makes it probably the nicest browser us OS9 users are ever going to get. Oh, I've also had a look at "http://validator.w3.org:8001/source/" (which wasn't linked) and found no flaws, however my eyes did start to glaze over after about the 6th undefined acronym, and by the 3rd code fragment in a language I don't know I got a bit lost ;-) Finally, regarding URL vs URI, I suggest consistency between the 2 uses, and a link to a definition of URI if URI is what you standardise on. - Andy_R
Received on Friday, 30 April 2004 12:01:33 UTC