- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 02:22:18 +0200
- To: www-validator@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> wrote:
>On Sat, 24 Apr 2004, David Dorward wrote:
>
>>I'll just reference my answer of 8 days ago:
>><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2004Apr/0081.html>
>
>I wonder whether it would be more useful to actually fix errors than
>keep telling over and over again that they have been fixed in a beta
>version.
Yes. Unfortunately, a series of errors in judgement on my part put us in a
situation where the relatively straightforward fix is waiting through this
interminably long beta period. However, the beta seems to be shaping up so
hopefully this particular issue will be solved some time in the reasonably
near future.
>It's hard to convince normal authors to fix their invalid markup when the
>validator's pages remain invalid, despite repeated reports.
Well, be fair. It's a) a bug, b) only manifests under obscure circumstances,
and c) only a single error. Anyone seriously using this as an argument against
Valid markup does not want to be convinced.
- --
Terje, you are a sick and twisted individual, and I
think I speak for all of us when I say, "Thank you!"
-- John Gruber <gruber@barebones.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3
iQA/AwUBQIsEuKPyPrIkdfXsEQLsdwCgrdz8DX5Lqb5oBjwiEdz78RMZUWwAoP8P
RTHDedLEFY6twgcS6Xf5wkB/
=1Tw9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Saturday, 24 April 2004 20:22:33 UTC