- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 17:48:46 +0900
- To: validators community <www-validator@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <87BDA6FF-975E-11D8-8A09-000A95E54002@w3.org>
On Apr 23, 2004, at 15:47, Terje Bless wrote: > Yea or Nay on the right-hand navbar is a question of whether > all pages should have a consistent look, with consistent navigation and > header/footer; or whether the symmetry can be traded off against... > Well, I > must admit I don't really see what nuking the right-hand navbar will > actually > gain you, but... "Something". :-) "something" being, in my mind at least, more space, less clutter, fewer not-too-relevant links on each page (esp. for non-css browsers and screen readers). > Well, IMO, in that case you can just as well move them to a separate > "links" > page (and then pretty much just delete them out of hand as nobody > checks links > pages). [for those not on IRC or following the CVS commits] We (er, you) eventually did that, which I can live with. A "links" page would seem a good idea if it did not sound so pre-search-engine era. >> Wild idea: use the fact that our top banner image is in B&W and use >> different stylesheets for results:invalid. That would allow a much >> smaller size of text (still necessary I think), along with the Error >> number maybe (was that what the old design had?) > > Ditto. What do you have in mind? valid -> call the stylesheet with the green banner invalid -> ditto red banner. (While keeping the "valid/invalid" text, of course) other pages : BW banner Just an idea, though. -- olivier
Received on Monday, 26 April 2004 04:49:13 UTC