Monday, 22 December 2003
Friday, 19 December 2003
- Re: RDF Semantics: two issues, connected to OWL
- Re: RDF Semantics: two issues, connected to OWL
- INVITATION - International MBA Business Tours in China
- INVITATION - International MBA Business Tours in China
Thursday, 18 December 2003
- Re: RDF Semantics: two issues, connected to OWL
- Re: RDF Semantics: two issues, connected to OWL
- Re: RDF Semantics: two issues, connected to OWL
Saturday, 13 December 2003
Friday, 12 December 2003
Tuesday, 9 December 2003
- Re: RDF Semantics: two issues, connected to OWL
- RDF Semantics: two issues, connected to OWL
- Re: RDF Semantics, non-lean RDF graphs, and redundancy of content
Monday, 8 December 2003
- Re: RDF Semantics, non-lean RDF graphs, and redundancy of content
- Re: RDF Semantics, non-lean RDF graphs, and redundancy of content
Friday, 5 December 2003
- Re: RDF Semantics, non-lean RDF graphs, and redundancy of content
- Re: RDF Semantics, non-lean RDF graphs, and redundancy of content
Thursday, 4 December 2003
- Re: RDF Semantics, non-lean RDF graphs, and redundancy of content
- Re: Some comments about the relationships between rdfs:subPropertyOf and rdfs:domain(rdfs:range)
- Re: RDF Semantics, non-lean RDF graphs, and redundancy of content
- RDF Semantics, non-lean RDF graphs, and redundancy of content
Wednesday, 3 December 2003
- Re: Some comments about the relationships between rdfs:subPropertyOf and rdfs:domain(rdfs:range)
- Re: Last call comments from the I18N WG on RDF WDs
- Re: Additional i18n RDF last call comments
Tuesday, 2 December 2003
- Re: Some comments about the relationships between rdfs:subPropertyOf and rdfs:domain(rdfs:range)
- Some comments about the relationships between rdfs:subPropertyOf and rdfs:domain(rdfs:range)
Monday, 1 December 2003
- Re: RDF Semantics: minor inconsistency
- Re: german translations, RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised)
- Re: german translations, RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised)
Sunday, 30 November 2003
- german translations, RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised)
- RE: Conformance model of RDF specs?
- Re: rong....
Friday, 28 November 2003
Thursday, 27 November 2003
- Re: Conformance model of RDF specs?
- [Fwd: Re: XML Core WG review of RDF drafts]
- Re: Conformance model of RDF specs?
Tuesday, 25 November 2003
Monday, 24 November 2003
Friday, 21 November 2003
Thursday, 20 November 2003
- Re: RDF Semantics: rdfs entailment lemma / terHorst-proof-review
- IPsmarx Technologies Inc. Canada
- Re: RDF Semantics: rdfs entailment lemma / terHorst-proof-review
Wednesday, 19 November 2003
- Re: RDF Semantics: rdfs entailment lemma / terHorst-proof-review
- Re: Additional i18n RDF last call comments
- Re: Additional i18n RDF last call comments
Monday, 17 November 2003
- Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-swartz-rdfcore-rdfxml-mediatype-03.txt
- Re: [closed] Re: Error in current WG test cases?
- Re: encoding of URI references in RDF/XML
- Typo in RDF semantics
- Re: RDF Semantics: rdfs entailment lemma
Friday, 14 November 2003
- Re: [closed] terHorst-proof-review
- [closed] terHorst-proof-review
- Re: RDF Semantics: rdfs entailment lemma
- Re: Additional i18n RDF last call comments
- Re: Last call comments from the I18N WG on RDF WDs
- [closed] Re: Picayune correction to WD-rdf-primer-20031010
- Re: RDF Semantics: rdfs entailment lemma
- Re: Picayune correction to WD-rdf-primer-20031010
Thursday, 13 November 2003
- Re: RDF Semantics: rdfs entailment lemma
- Re: [closed] Re: Missing test:entailmentRules arcs
- [closed] Re: WebOnt review of LC2 RDF Schema
- WebOnt review of LC2 RDF Schema
- Re: RDF semantics: problems with entailment rules rdfs5 and rdfs9
- Re: RDF Semantics: rdfs entailment lemma
- Re: Last call comments from the I18N WG on RDF WDs
- [closed] Re: minor errors in WD-rdf-primer-20030905
- Re: [closed] Re: test format has bad semantics?
- [closed] Re: datatypes-test001 incorrect
- [closed] Re: test format has bad semantics?
- RE: RDF Core Test Results: Call For Data Feeds
- RE: [closed] Re: four failing tests are incorrect
- Re: [closed] Re: Missing test:entailmentRules arcs
- [closed] Re: Missing test:entailmentRules arcs
- Re: encoding of URI references in RDF/XML
- [closed] Re: Error in current WG test cases?
- [closed] Re: Resolution of Relative URI References (test case xmlbase/test012.rdf)
- [closed] Re: four failing tests are incorrect
- Re: minor errors in WD-rdf-primer-20030905
Wednesday, 12 November 2003
- Re: Last call comments from the I18N WG on RDF WDs
- Re: proposed test like rdfms-seq-representation/Manifest.rdf#test002
- RDF semantics comments
- Re: RDF Semantics: rdfs entailment lemma
- proposed test like rdfms-seq-representation/Manifest.rdf#test002
- Re: RDF Core Test Results: Call For Data Feeds
- Re: RDF Core Test Results: Call For Data Feeds
- Re: RDF Core Test Results: Call For Data Feeds
- Re: RDF Core Test Results: Call For Data Feeds
- Re: RDF Semantics: partial review
- Re: RDF Semantics: D-interpretations
- Re: Picayune correction to WD-rdf-primer-20031010
- Re: minor errors in WD-rdf-primer-20030905
- Re: proposal to close comments from semantics review
- Re: RDF Semantics: rdfs entailment lemma
- Re: RDF Semantics: partial review
- RDF Semantics: D-interpretations
- rong....
Tuesday, 11 November 2003
Monday, 10 November 2003
- [closed] Re: character encoding in RDF (including some new related issues)
- Re: character encoding in RDF (including some new related issues)
- fragment identifiers
Sunday, 9 November 2003
Saturday, 8 November 2003
Friday, 7 November 2003
- four failing tests are incorrect
- Re: RDF Semantics: partial review
- Re: RDF Semantics: a partial review
- Re: RDF Semantics: a few small comments
- Jena RDF test results
- test format has bad semantics?
- Re: RDF semantics: problems with entailment rules rdfs5 and rdfs9
- RDF Semantics: a few small comments
- Re: RDF Semantics: a partial review
- Error in current WG test cases?
- Re: RDF semantics: problems with entailment rules rdfs5 and rdfs9
- Re: character encoding in RDF (including some new related issues)
- Re: RDF Semantics: a partial review
- Re: RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax: two comments
- Re: on RDFS 1.0 031010
- Re: encoding of URI references in RDF/XML
- Re: RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax: two comments
- Additional i18n RDF last call comments
- Last call comments from the I18N WG on RDF WDs
- RE: encoding of URI references in RDF/XML
- RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax: two comments
- Re: RDF Semantics: partial review
- Re: RDF Semantics: a partial review
- Re: encoding of URI references in RDF/XML (was Re: character encoding in RDF (including some new related issues))
- Re: character encoding in RDF (including some new related issues)
- Re: Missing test:entailmentRules arcs
- RDF semantics: problems with entailment rules rdfs5 and rdfs9
- Re: character encoding in RDF (including some new related issues)
- Surnia contributing to RDF Core Test Results
- Missing test:entailmentRules arcs
Thursday, 6 November 2003
- Re: [closed] pfps-04, pfps-05: dissatisfaction with the entailment rules development
- Re: RDF Semantics: rdfs entailment lemma
- Re: [closed] pfps-04, pfps-05: dissatisfaction with the entailment rules development
- encoding of URI references in RDF/XML (was Re: character encoding in RDF (including some new related issues))
- Re: character encoding in RDF (including some new related issues)
- Re: RDF Semantics: a partial review
- RDF Semantics: rdfs entailment lemma
- Re: RDF Semantics: a partial review
- Re: character encoding in RDF (including some new related issues)
- Re: character encoding in RDF (including some new related issues)
- Re: character encoding in RDF
- Picayune correction to WD-rdf-primer-20031010
Tuesday, 4 November 2003
- Re: [closed] pfps-04, pfps-05: dissatisfaction with the entailment rules development
- Re: [closed] pfps-04, pfps-05: dissatisfaction with the entailment rules development
- Re: character encoding in RDF
- Re: character encoding in RDF
- Re: character encoding in RDF
- Re: character encoding in RDF
- [closed] pfps-04, pfps-05: dissatisfaction with the entailment rules development
Monday, 3 November 2003
- Re: [closed] WebOnt WG comment on Concepts and Abstract Syntax Document
- Re: minor errors in WD-rdf-primer-20030905
- Re: minor errors in WD-rdf-primer-20030905
- [closed] Re: RDF 2nd LC documents
- RDF 2nd LC documents
Sunday, 2 November 2003
Friday, 31 October 2003
- Expressing operators and functions in RDF
- Re: [closed] Re: proposed test of RDFS entailment rules
- [closed] Re: proposed test of RDFS entailment rules
- Re: incompleteness of RDF Semantics Document
- incompleteness of RDF Semantics Document
- ARCHITECTS
- Re: [closed]Re: Some suggestions for http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax- ns#
- [closed] Re: property attributes on parseType="Resource" ?
- Re: property attributes on parseType="Resource" ?
Thursday, 30 October 2003
- Re: property attributes on parseType="Resource" ?
- [closed]Re: Some suggestions for http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax- ns#
- Re: [closed] Re: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
- [closed] Re: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
Wednesday, 29 October 2003
Thursday, 30 October 2003
Wednesday, 29 October 2003
Tuesday, 28 October 2003
Monday, 27 October 2003
Thursday, 23 October 2003
Wednesday, 22 October 2003
Tuesday, 21 October 2003
Monday, 20 October 2003
Saturday, 18 October 2003
Friday, 17 October 2003
- Re: RDF Semantics: a partial review
- Re: Some suggestions for http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
- Re: Some suggestions for http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
- [closed] datatypeString-production Re: Production datatypeString in RDF Test Cases (2003/09/05)
- RE: Production datatypeString in RDF Test Cases (2003/09/05)
- Some suggestions for http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
- Re: Production datatypeString in RDF Test Cases (2003/09/05)
- RDF Semantics: a partial review
- Diseño de paginas web en argentina gracias a ClickClick !!
Thursday, 16 October 2003
Wednesday, 15 October 2003
- on RDFS 1.0, 031010
- RE: Production datatypeString in RDF Test Cases (2003/09/05)
- Resolution of Relative URI References (test case xmlbase/test012.rdf)
- Re: Production datatypeString in RDF Test Cases (2003/09/05)
- entailment-from-inconsistent-graph [was: proposed test of RDFS entailment rules]
Tuesday, 14 October 2003
- Re: Production datatypeString in RDF Test Cases (2003/09/05)
- Production datatypeString in RDF Test Cases (2003/09/05)
Monday, 13 October 2003
Saturday, 11 October 2003
Friday, 10 October 2003
Thursday, 9 October 2003
- Re: [closed] xmlsch-10 canonical syntax
- Re: [closed] xmlsch-12 capricious syntax
- We are available to codesign these 189 Master Architect Designs
Wednesday, 8 October 2003
Tuesday, 7 October 2003
- Re: proposed test of RDFS entailment rules
- Re: [closed] RDF Core LC issue xmlsch-08
- Re: XML Schema WG responses to RDF Core WG on xmlsch-02
- RE: XML schema responses on comments xmlsch-01, xmlsch-03, xmlsch-04, xmlsch-05, xmlsch-06 [was: Schema WG responses to RDF Core WG
- [closed] Re: a comment on NFC
- RE: XML schema responses on comments xmlsch-01, xmlsch-03, xmlsch-04, xmlsch-05, xmlsch-06 [was: Schema WG responses to RDF Core WG
- proposed test of RDFS entailment rules
- Re: a comment on NFC
- Re: a comment on NFC
Monday, 6 October 2003
- Re: XML Schema WG comments on RDF documents
- Re: [closed] xmlsch-10 canonical syntax
- Re: [closed] xmlsch-12 capricious syntax
- Re: [closed] RDF Core LC issue xmlsch-08
Saturday, 4 October 2003
- Re: Internal DTD Examples Invalidate the RDF/XML Documents
- RE: Internal DTD Examples Invalidate the RDF/XML Documents
Friday, 3 October 2003
- Re: XML Schema WG comments on RDF documents
- Re: [closed] xmlsch-12 capricious syntax
- Re: [closed] xmlsch-11 layering on xml
- Re: [closed] xmlsch-10 canonical syntax
- Re: [closed] RDF Core LC issue xmlsch-09
- Re: [closed] RDF Core LC issue xmlsch-08
- XML Schema WG responses to RDF Core WG
- Re: Internal DTD Examples Invalidate the RDF/XML Documents
- RE: Internal DTD Examples Invalidate the RDF/XML Documents
- Re: Internal DTD Examples Invalidate the RDF/XML Documents
- RE: Internal DTD Examples Invalidate the RDF/XML Documents