- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:10:10 +0000
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > Sorry for butting in ... > Not at all - I misread the question - thanks for straigtening things out. Brian > >>e.g., is a RDF/XML parser required to be a validating XML parser? > > > No, it is not. This causes some known issues when a validating XML parser and > a non-validating XML parser may give different RDF graphs. (e.g. because XML > validation adds a default attribute which then maps to a triple) > > > > >> Is >>there a minimal list of encodings that an RDF/XML parser should support? > > > UTF-8 and UTF-16 I think is what is specified by XML, RDF does not add to > these. > > Jeremy
Received on Friday, 28 November 2003 05:11:50 UTC