Re: [closed] xmlsch-10 canonical syntax

On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 18:25, Brian McBride wrote:
> Michael,
...
> I have also included this as a formal objection listed at:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#Objections
> 
> This currently treats your objections on xmlsch-10 and xmlsch-12 as a 
> single objection entitled "Failure to revise the RDF/XML syntax" and 
> also includes a reference to the xmlsch-12 last call comment for 
> completeness.  I hope this is a fair representation of the position, but 
> please feel free to let me know if you would like this presented 
> differently.

I believe this is a fair representation.  Thanks.

Michael

Received on Thursday, 9 October 2003 16:49:25 UTC