- From: <Sven.Hartrumpf@fernuni-hagen.de>
- Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 15:49:55 +0100 (CET)
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Message-Id: <20031103.154955.74725125.Sven.Hartrumpf@FernUni-Hagen.de>
On 03 Nov 2003, Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> wrote: > > month, day, and year -> > > (illogical order; I know: some don't like logic :-) ) > > > This is the way Americans write dates; it has nothing to do with logic! > I fear that a certain amount of tolerance for the linguistic > peculiarities of strange languages (like American) is going to be > necessary in applying RDF :-) All the more reason to explicitly > identify the various components! > > Slightly more seriously, this refers to the components of the > exterms:creation-date property in a previous example, and the components > are written in month, day, and year order ("August 16, 1999"). Agreed. > > later in this section). -> > > later in this section.) > > > > in explaining the example). -> > > in explaining the example.) > > > Regarding these last two, these parenthetical remarks are not intended > to be *independent* sentences, even though they have the form of > complete sentences, and hence the punctuation goes outside the > parentheses. The alternative is to not only make the changes you > suggest, but also to capitalize the first word of the parenthetical > remark, Yes, but this is already the case, see below. > and insert another period to complete the previous sentence. > I'd just as soon leave these alone, if you can stand it. This is from http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-primer-20031010/: (Note that a typed literal is not used for the date value in this example. Representing typed literals in RDF/XML will be described later in this section). ... (Line numbers are added to help in explaining the example). Greetings Sven
Received on Monday, 3 November 2003 09:50:16 UTC