- From: <Sven.Hartrumpf@fernuni-hagen.de>
- Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 15:49:55 +0100 (CET)
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Message-Id: <20031103.154955.74725125.Sven.Hartrumpf@FernUni-Hagen.de>
On 03 Nov 2003, Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> wrote:
> > month, day, and year ->
> > (illogical order; I know: some don't like logic :-) )
>
>
> This is the way Americans write dates; it has nothing to do with logic!
> I fear that a certain amount of tolerance for the linguistic
> peculiarities of strange languages (like American) is going to be
> necessary in applying RDF :-) All the more reason to explicitly
> identify the various components!
>
> Slightly more seriously, this refers to the components of the
> exterms:creation-date property in a previous example, and the components
> are written in month, day, and year order ("August 16, 1999").
Agreed.
> > later in this section). ->
> > later in this section.)
> >
> > in explaining the example). ->
> > in explaining the example.)
>
>
> Regarding these last two, these parenthetical remarks are not intended
> to be *independent* sentences, even though they have the form of
> complete sentences, and hence the punctuation goes outside the
> parentheses. The alternative is to not only make the changes you
> suggest, but also to capitalize the first word of the parenthetical
> remark,
Yes, but this is already the case, see below.
> and insert another period to complete the previous sentence.
> I'd just as soon leave these alone, if you can stand it.
This is from http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-primer-20031010/:
(Note that a typed literal is not used for the date value in this
example. Representing typed literals in RDF/XML will be described
later in this section).
...
(Line numbers are added to help in explaining the example).
Greetings
Sven
Received on Monday, 3 November 2003 09:50:16 UTC