- From: Stephane Fellah <fellah@pcigeomatics.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 17:45:49 -0500
- To: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>, <jena-dev@yahoogroups.com>
- Cc: <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>, "Weisheng Li" <weisheng@pcigeomatics.com>, "Steven Keens" <skeens@pcigeomatics.com>
Hi, I am working on the design of a OWL ontology for operations and functions (some are spatial and temporal) that can be used by a Rule language (for example current draft OWL Rules). Prior developing the ontology, I am trying to produce some examples in RDF-XML syntax to express these operations/functions. CWM has already some build-in operators. I can distinguish 3 cases for the moment: Case 1: binary operator using a Resource as left operand : Example: (Polygon perimeter 20) This is the easiest case. Case 2: binary operator using a Literal as left operand : example ( -1 absoluteValue 1). In this case, the literal needs to be placed in a List (of operands/arguments). In RDF it should look like this: <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:math="http://www.examples/operator/numeric#"> <rdf:List> <rdf:first>-1</rdf:first> <rdf:rest rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil"/> <math:absoluteValue>1</math:absoluteValue> </rdf:List> </rdf:RDF> Is there a more compact way to express this using rdf:parseType="Collection" ? The RDF specification does not seem to provide a syntax for this. Case 3: operator with a arity >=3 Example : (1,2) sum 3 In this the n-ary relationship I use a RDF List for the Subject. <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:math="http://www.examples/operator/numeric#"> <rdf:List> <rdf:first>1</rdf:first> <rdf:rest parseType="Resource"> <rdf:first>2</rdf:first> <rdf:rest rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil"/> </rdf:rest> <math:sum>3</math:sum> </rdf:List> </rdf:RDF> Once again, is there any more compact and readable way to express this using rdf:Parse="Collection when element of a list are literal ? I am finding the RDF syntax quite ugly if parseCollection cannot be used. Your improvements are welcome. Is the approach I am taking for expressing operators seems to you OK, or am I on the wrong track to express operators and functions in RDF ?. Best regards Stephane Fellah Senior Software Engineer PCI Geomatics 490, Boulevard St Joseph Hull, Quebec Canada J8Y 3Y7 Tel: 1 819 770 0022 Ext. 223 Fax 1 819 770 0098 Visit our web site: www.pcigeomatics.com
Received on Friday, 31 October 2003 17:45:49 UTC