W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > October to December 2003

Re: Missing test:entailmentRules arcs

From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:53:26 +0000 (GMT)
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0311071042220.26055@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

Sandro, thank-you for your comments, and for taking the time to run the
test cases.

On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Sandro Hawke wrote:

> The following entailment tests are not really defined (and dont work
> in my test harness), since they have no entailmentRules data:
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/datatypes/Manifest.rdf#test008
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/datatypes/Manifest.rdf#test009

The intention is that in the absence of other entailmentRules, simple
entailment is used. I note that that condition is missing from the test
case document through editorial oversight; my proposed fix is to add the

In the case that no test:entailmentRules elements are present, the rules
of simple entailment as specified in [RDF-SEMANTICS] are used.

> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/Manifest.rdf#test007a
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/Manifest.rdf#test007b
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/Manifest.rdf#test007c

Again, these tests demonstrate the distinction between language-tagged
and non-language-tagged plain literals, and should be viewed as simple

With the addition of the above editoral fix to the test case document,
would your concerns here be addressed?

jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/
Unfortunately, I have a very good idea how fast my keys are moving.
Received on Friday, 7 November 2003 05:56:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:04 UTC