- From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:53:26 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Sandro, thank-you for your comments, and for taking the time to run the test cases. On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Sandro Hawke wrote: > The following entailment tests are not really defined (and dont work > in my test harness), since they have no entailmentRules data: > > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/datatypes/Manifest.rdf#test008 > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/datatypes/Manifest.rdf#test009 The intention is that in the absence of other entailmentRules, simple entailment is used. I note that that condition is missing from the test case document through editorial oversight; my proposed fix is to add the text, [[ In the case that no test:entailmentRules elements are present, the rules of simple entailment as specified in [RDF-SEMANTICS] are used. ]] > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/Manifest.rdf#test007a > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/Manifest.rdf#test007b > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/Manifest.rdf#test007c Again, these tests demonstrate the distinction between language-tagged and non-language-tagged plain literals, and should be viewed as simple entailments. With the addition of the above editoral fix to the test case document, would your concerns here be addressed? -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ Unfortunately, I have a very good idea how fast my keys are moving.
Received on Friday, 7 November 2003 05:56:06 UTC