- From: <herman.ter.horst@philips.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:04:06 +0100
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
This is a new comment - I am sorry that I didn't see this before the LC2 deadline. D-interpretations are defined of RDF graphs and not for vocabularies. This seems to contradict the great stress in the document on uniformity of the various definitions of entailment. I vaguely remember that in an early version of the text there was a reason to define D-interpretations for graphs and not for vocabularies. However, the current definition uses only the properties of an rdfs-interpretation and nothing about the graph G. So it seems that this can easily be changed to become consistent and uniform with the remainder of the document. My proposal is to define D-interpretations of vocabularies instead of graphs. A motivation for making this change is that the OWL Semantics document explicitly makes use of the definition of D-interpretations, for vocabularies and not for graphs. Herman ter Horst
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:04:53 UTC