- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 10:44:44 -0500
- To: Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org>
- Cc: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Martin-- I'd like to pick up (actually, close!) this particular thread, to which I last responded in message http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003OctDec/0199.html I haven't had a response from you to that message (and then the Thanksgiving holidays intervened), and would like to know if the proposed changes (plus the earlier ones I'd agreed to make in earlier messages on this thread) are acceptable responses. I'd note, by the way, that all the changes I'd proposed in this thread (including the ones I described in my last message) are made in the current Primer Editor's Draft (dated 19 November). NB: This *doesn't* cover the interactions we're currently having on the separate thread headed "Last call comments from the I18N WG on RDF WDs". I got your last message on that thread on 11/24, just before I left town for a week, and I'll be responding with a separate message on that. --Frank Frank Manola wrote: > > NB: In case people get this twice, the following is a resend; I've > been having some email problems > > Martin Duerst wrote: > >> Hello Frank, >> >> Many thanks for getting back to me (and the I18N WG) so quickly. >> Some more details below. > > > > You're welcome. Additional comments on the changes I hadn't agreed to > make in my previous message appear below: > snip
Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2003 10:18:04 UTC