- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 17:53:52 +0000
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Sandro, Given that your acceptance in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003OctDec/0176.html and below [[ That should be interesting. Since you chose to consider both the same issue, it's not closed until that one is answered. ]] I'm interpretting this as acceptably closed. Brian Sandro Hawke wrote: >>On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Sandro Hawke wrote: >> >> >>>The following entailment tests are not really defined (and dont work >>>in my test harness), since they have no entailmentRules data: >>> >>>http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/datatypes/Manifest.rdf#test008 >>>http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/datatypes/Manifest.rdf#test009 >>>http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/Manifest.rdf#test >> >>007a >> >>>http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/Manifest.rdf#test >> >>007b >> >>>http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/Manifest.rdf#test >> >>007c >> >>An explicit marker has been added to those test cases, and the following >>editorial text added to the test case document: >> >>[[ >>For test cases that use simple entailment, the following marker is >>used: >> >><test:entailmentRules rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfco >>re/testSchema#simpleEntailment" /> >>]] >> >>This should permit you to exactly identify those test cases. > > > Yeah, in so far as we don't call this an RDF graph. :-( > > >>A response to your related comment will follow shortly. > > > That should be interesting. Since you chose to consider both the same > issue, it's not closed until that one is answered. (And given your > answer to this one, I can't imagine how you'll have a satisfactory > response to that one.) > > -- sandro
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2003 12:54:54 UTC